African stampede - why the scramble for Africa can benefit both international and local firms
The stampede to enter the African legal market can benefit both international and local law firms, says Shearman & Sterling's Christophe Asselineau
August 31, 2011 at 07:03 PM
5 minute read
The stampede to enter the African legal market can benefit both international and local law firms, says Shearman & Sterling's Christophe Asselineau
If you choose to believe the press and law firms' marketing materials, it seems that every law firm with global ambitions, including a few that never had a particular interest or expertise in the region, are now busy conquering the African legal markets and trumpeting their African experience.
The realisation may have hit some partners when watching the last football World Cup that there was a large continent with 54 countries and one billion people where they could record a few billable hours to reach their targets. However, the more obvious reasons for this sudden passion have been reported many times:
- As a continent rich in natural resources, Africa is to satisfy the increasing demands for raw materials from emerging economies.
- Its needs for infrastructure are considerable and require vast amounts of financing.
- Its large population represents a substantial market for consumer goods and services of all kinds, including in heavily regulated sectors such as telecoms or financial services.
- Its average growth rate appears attractive compared to those of other regions, particularly during quasi recession times.
- Last but not least, Africa appears relatively under-lawyered.
The scramble
As a result, it is said that there is currently a 'scramble for Africa' among law firms. This is an interesting idea, since the expression was coined in 1884 to reflect the fact that the race between European powers to secure territories was seen by some, in the words of Thomas Pakenham, author of The Scramble for Africa, to be "as undignified as a scramble for pennies".
However, while it is easy enough to draw comparisons between this current surge of interest and the 19th century race for colonies as a source of lawyer jokes or politically correct comments, not much has yet been said about what this influx of commercial lawyers could contribute to Africa.
Armies of accountants
This situation reminds me of a comment made a few years ago by a Congolese friend while stuck in a traffic jam in Kinshasa that "the United Nations (UN) seemed to think that what the people of the Democratic Republic of Congo needed the most were dozens of white four wheel drives filled with armies of similarly coloured accountants".
This comment was probably unfair on the UN (and on accountants), but it is a sobering warning to any business lawyer who would seek to claim that a surge of Western commercial lawyers is the answer to Africa's problems. Yet even if some dismiss the interest of international business law firms in Africa as purely motivated by greed or yet another form of Western predatory behaviour, there are arguably reasons why this increased activity could be a good thing for the continent.
Better protection of African states' interests
Africa is a continent where governments or state-owned companies are still running many sectors of the economy and where states and national companies resort to using international lawyers only when faced with international arbitration.
A benefit of the increased interaction between business lawyers representing investors and civil servants is the emergence of more experienced state negotiators able to negotiate complex documentation to world standards.
It also encourages governments to increasingly use international lawyers at the negotiation stage. This arguably results in the interests of the host countries being better protected and thus should create fewer reasons for governments to re-open or cancel these contracts. It therefore contributes to the perception of increased legal stability necessary to encourage international investments.
Developing local skills and creating opportunities
As has happened in other regions before, the arrival of international law firms often means an increase in the local standards of lawyering and new opportunities for local practitioners to work with, join, or lead the local offices of these firms. It will also create an opportunity for members of the African diaspora trained in Western law schools and currently working in international law firms to bring back these skills and develop local law firms either independently or as the local arms of global law firms.
In addition, with the increased development and enforcement of anti-corruption legislation, international lawyers will have to put these issues to the fore when transactions risk venturing into such territories. In practical terms it is hoped that this will curb some of these practices.
Efficient pro bono
Many international law firms have extensive pro bono programmes that, while derided by some as another form of advertising, are much welcomed by the people who benefit from them. Without overstating their case, these programmes can make a useful contribution to the development of the rule of law in a number of African countries through training of the judiciary, advocacy programmes or legislation review. The resources that international law firms dedicate to such programmes can be quite considerable and the portion dedicated to Africa will only increase as these firms expand their operations on the continent.
Political scientists and sociologists may debate whether having more lawyers in a country is necessarily conducive to economic development, democracy and a fairer allocation of wealth. We should not expect too much too quickly. We also must recognise that there are quite a few things that Africa can teach international business lawyers. However, let's not underestimate the contribution that these lawyers could make to the development of Africa.
Christophe Asselineau is the partner in charge of project development and finance at Shearman & Sterling's Paris office advising foreign investors and African Governments on projects and corporate transactions.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250