SRA reforms suitability test ahead of Tesco law rollout
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has unveiled a new suitability test to protect standards for individuals and businesses working in regulated legal fields. The SRA is set to replace its existing ''Character and Suitability Test' with a new 'Suitability Test' from 6 October, coinciding with the launch of the watchdog's much-touted new model of 'outcomes-focused regulation' (OFR).
September 02, 2011 at 09:45 AM
3 minute read
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has unveiled a new suitability test to protect standards for individuals and businesses working in regulated legal fields.
The SRA is set to replace its existing 'Character and Suitability Test' with a new 'Suitability Test' from 6 October, coinciding with the launch of the watchdog's much-touted new model of 'outcomes-focused regulation' (OFR).
The main differences from the old test include the SRA widening the type of offences that could bar an individual from working in the legal industry, while also providing more detail on requirements for establishing rehabilitation.
Previously, only convictions for "offences involving dishonesty" were covered under the suitability rules, with the new rules including more detail on factors which would be likely to bar applicants. Such areas include being convicted for a criminal offences involving dishonesty, fraud, perjury, bribery or racially aggravated crimes.
The test spans a wider range of entrants due to the impending deregulation of the legal market, which will see non-lawyers able to enter the legal industry through alternative business structures (ABSs). A specific new section applies to non-solicitor applicants that want to own ABSs, as well as corporate entities running services regulated by the SRA. The regime, which comes into force under the Legal Services Act, is currently expected to take effect from early 2012.
The test will also cover new compliance officers that each law firm has to appoint under the OFR regime – a major shake-up of the SRA's work that it says will target regulatory efforts towards high impact risks.
SRA chief executive Antony Townsend (pictured) commented: "The changes we've introduced are designed to make the process more transparent. However, the basic standard remains the same; we expect those we regulate to have the highest moral and ethical standards, because they have important responsibilities and trust placed upon them."
The changes were consulted on with the profession amid the consultation on the new handbook for OFR. The SRA said a majority were supportive of the changes, but that it had made a number of amendments as a result of the consultation including, for example, clarification on disclosure of driving offences.
Related:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore Litigators Shift Competitive Landscape as Another Senior Duo Sets Up Own Shop
US Judge Allows $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit Against Sierra Leone to Proceed
2 minute readLondon Trial Against BHP Alleges ‘Red Flags’ Leading up to Brazil Mining Disaster Were Ignored
Trending Stories
- 1Some Thoughts on What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
- 2Artificial Wisdom or Automated Folly? Practical Considerations for Arbitration Practitioners to Address the AI Conundrum
- 3The New Global M&A Kings All Have Something in Common
- 4Big Law Aims to Make DEI Less Divisive in Trump's Second Term
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250