A&O report reveals £3m redundancy costs in back office shake-up
Allen & Overy (A&O) has set aside £3m for City redundancy payouts as it overhauls its back office team in light of its new 'onshoring' arm in Belfast. The total cost towards the Northern Ireland support centre was £4m in the 2010-11 financial year, according to the magic circle firm's annual report, of which £3m will be spent on redundancy payouts. However, the firm will be able to claim back the majority of that cost through a £2.5m grant it will receive from Invest Northern Ireland for creating local jobs.
September 06, 2011 at 09:00 AM
3 minute read
Allen & Overy (A&O) has set aside £3m for City redundancy payouts as it overhauls its back office team in light of its new 'onshoring' arm in Belfast.
The total cost towards the Northern Ireland support centre was £4m in the 2010-11 financial year, according to the magic circle firm's annual report, of which £3m will be spent on redundancy payouts. However, the firm will be able to claim back the majority of that cost through a £2.5m grant it will receive from Invest Northern Ireland for creating local jobs.
One hundred and fifty-five London business support jobs are at risk due to the launch in Belfast this autumn. The report states that the Belfast operation will save £11m in its first five years of operation and £8m annually after that.
The news comes as part of A&O's financial report for 2010-11, which is issued with its annual review, which also highlighted a number of other costs and a decline in profits available to be paid out.
Although the firm reported average profits per equity partner had remained stable at £1.1m for last year, the firm's profits available for distribution among members was down by 9%, from £328.6m the previous year to £298m in 2010-11.
Meanwhile, total costs at the firm, which has sustained sizeable international investment over the last 18 months, increased by 6% to £675m, while one-off costs reached £29m, including £24.6m for relocating 200 staff from its Canary Wharf outpost earlier this year. However, the property cost is included for accounting reasons as it will be spread over partner distributions throughout the length of the lease.
The firm's annual review also highlighted a decline in the amount of hours spent on pro bono work by the firm's lawyers from 57,300 hours in 2009-10 to 41,718, while the total percentage of lawyers who recorded time on pro bono work fell from 45% to 30%. If measured in billable time, the total value of the pro bono hours fell from £18.39m to £14.31m.
The report also includes details of the City giant's ethnic and gender mix at various levels. The gender split saw a minor decrease in the proportion of women partners, falling 1% to 15%, while the proportion of female associates remained at 45%. Fifty-six percent of the firm's trainees are currently female, up from 54% the previous year, while women continue to dominate support staff roles, counting for 73%, compared to 72% last year.
The report shows that 6% of the firm's partners are designated as part of an ethnic minority, though 5% were unclassified. Seventeen percent of associates are classed as ethnic minorities, rising to 22% for trainees.
Total staff costs rose to £417m from £383.9m on the back of the firm's expansion, which included office openings in Australia and Qatar. The firm reported a turnover rise of 7% for the financial year to £1.12bn, while the average number of equity partners grew by 12%, including 34 lateral hires.
The firm's senior management, David Morley and Wim Dejonghe, strike a confident tone in an interview introducing the annual review. Morley comments: "I'm very bullish about the future of the firm. We occupy a position very few of our competitors enjoy, particularly with the growing trend towards globalisation and the fact that businesses are increasingly working across borders. I see growing demand for top-tier legal advice."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCox & Palmer to Merge with Benson Buffett in St. John’s, Canada’s Easternmost City
2 minute readAsia's Top Stories 2024: Departures, Layoffs and Breakups at the Likes of Kirkland, Skadden and Mayer Brown
A&O Shearman’s South African Lawyers in Last-minute Talks To Find Jobs Before Closure
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250