SNR Denton star to receive £650k in new pay regime despite PEP dip
SNR Denton's top-earning UK partner looks set to take home around £150,000 more during 2011-12 than last year under a post-merger shake-up of partner remuneration, it has emerged. An internal announcement sent to partners over the summer confirmed the spread of the equity, as well as details of the move to merit-based pay at the UK arm of the transatlantic law firm.
September 07, 2011 at 07:03 PM
2 minute read
SNR Denton's top-earning UK partner looks set to take home around £150,000 more during 2011-12 than last year under a post-merger shake-up of partner remuneration, it has emerged.
An internal announcement sent to partners over the summer confirmed the spread of the equity, as well as details of the move to merit-based pay at the UK arm of the transatlantic law firm.
The highest-earning full equity partner will take home £650,000, while those at the bottom have been guaranteed at least £150,000, compared with an equity spread of between £150,000 and roughly £500,000 last year.
The news comes despite SNR Denton reporting PEP of £232,000 for its UK arm during 2010-11, compared with £360,000 the previous year. Partners at the firm said pay had been cushioned, and that remuneration during the current financial year would have been lower if based on the value of each equity point.
Earnings paid out during the current financial year will be based largely on legacy Dentons' modified lockstep model, with 30% based on merit. From next year partners will be paid purely on merit and have already been told where they sit on a merit ladder to be used for allocating 2011-12 profits. An additional bonus will also be made available on top of the ladder allocation.
The firm, the product of the merger last September between Denton Wilde Sapte and Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal, has published details about individual profit allocations for this year and next on a portal which the partners can request a password to log on to.
A spokesperson said: "The changes to the structure see us aligning with the US arm of the practice, where the principle is that greater effort brings a bigger reward."
Related:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJenner & Block Expands London Team with Baker McKenzie Hire to Lead New Practice Area
2 minute readBennett Jones Securities Partner Alan Gardner Remembered as a Brilliant Lawyer & Mentor
3 minute readFreshfields Leads European M&A Rankings Again in 2024, as U.S. Firms Gain Market Share
5 minute readHSF Defends Bayer on Roundup Class Action as Litigation Comes to an End in Australia
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Arbitrators Under Fire for Allegedly Forcing Workers to 'Stay or Pay' Employers
- 2Plaintiff Narrowly Avoids Dismissal Over Lengthy Complaint Filed in Federal Court
- 3Goodwin to Launch Brussels Office With Quinn Emanuel Antitrust Partner
- 4Looking to the Future of the FDA and Its Impact on Drug Regulation in 2025
- 5Pennsylvania Firms Join Partnership Promotion Parade
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250