Government immigration proposals could hit firms' global recruitment, warns Law Soc
The Law Society has criticised government proposals to limit business migration which could complicate international recruitment for UK law firms. As part of a wider review of UK immigration policy, the Government is currently considering ending the automatic right for migrants holding Tier 2 visas to apply for permanent residency after living and working in the UK for five years. The Law Society has said that these plans could negatively affect the competitiveness of UK business, as many large City firms rely on the expertise of skilled migrant workers from outside the European Economic Area (EEA).
September 16, 2011 at 10:27 AM
3 minute read
The Law Society has criticised government proposals to limit business migration which could complicate international recruitment for UK law firms.
As part of a wider review of UK immigration policy, the Government is currently considering ending the automatic right for migrants holding Tier 2 visas to apply for permanent residency after living and working in the UK for five years.
The Law Society has said that these plans could negatively affect the competitiveness of UK business, as many large City firms rely on the expertise of skilled migrant workers from outside the European Economic Area (EEA).
Law Society president John Wotton said: "Law firms turn to the international market because they are engaged in a global competition for talent with international firms from other jurisdictions, such as the US. Global legal businesses are interested in recruiting only the best talent. Non-EEA migrants employed by law firms tend to be high earners. They will be spending their disposable income and paying taxes in the UK."
Further stringent conditions on UK immigration are likely to affect many law firms as they will be less inclined to invest in bringing people into the country if there is uncertainty over whether they can remain in the country on a long-term basis.
PricewaterhouseCoopers partner and head of global immigration Julia Onslow-Cole commented: "Our clients are certainly telling us that the cap is having an economic impact, as organisations have had to delay hiring key individuals and consider relocating roles overseas."
Many law firms also train international staff in London with a view to returning them to their country of origin to be better able to serve local markets.
Clifford Chance senior partner Malcolm Sweeting said: "Lawyers with strong roots in growth markets will become very valuable, and in some of these markets legal capacity is not keeping up with the pace of economic growth.
"As a result it will be incumbent upon us to help to create the right legal talent for those markets to allow them to grow successfully. Movement of lawyers within international law firms will therefore become increasingly important, but in the UK this remains subject to immigration laws."
The proposals are part of the Government's commitment to reduce the level of net migration to the UK to tens of thousands by 2015.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore Litigators Shift Competitive Landscape as Another Senior Duo Sets Up Own Shop
US Judge Allows $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit Against Sierra Leone to Proceed
2 minute readLondon Trial Against BHP Alleges ‘Red Flags’ Leading up to Brazil Mining Disaster Were Ignored
Trending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250