Simmons revamps flexible working scheme for fee earners
Simmons & Simmons has overhauled its flexible working scheme to make it easier for transactional lawyers to work reduced hours. The firm is set to pilot a new scheme that will allow all fee earners, including partners, to agree a percentage reduction in their annual working hours, with the flexibility to take the time off as they choose rather than being committed to working a certain number of hours each week.
September 28, 2011 at 07:03 PM
2 minute read
Simmons & Simmons has overhauled its flexible working scheme to make it easier for transactional lawyers to work reduced hours.
The firm is set to pilot a new scheme that will allow all fee earners, including partners, to agree a percentage reduction in their annual working hours, with the flexibility to take the time off as they choose rather than being committed to working a certain number of hours each week.
It is intended to make it easier for transactional lawyers to work flexibly by, for example, allowing them to work full-time on a deal and then to take time off between transactions.
Roughly 10% of Simmons' partnership and some 20% of associates have already signed up to formal flexible working arrangements but, to date, these have centred on working a set number of days per week.
By relaxing the scheme the firm hopes to discourage departures for smaller firms perceived to have a better work/life balance and, in the longer term, increase the number of women in its partnership.
The initiative, which has been spearheaded by City employment partner Julian Taylor, will be open to both male and female lawyers. Respective practice group heads will be charged with agreeing each lawyer's schedule.
Simmons managing partner Jeremy Hoyland (pictured) said: "The goal in the long term with increasing flexibility is to preserve talent in the firm, ensuring our best lawyers remain and can be promoted. It marks a major change for the firm, as we are showing that we no longer view flexible working solely as a diversity issue but as a management priority."
The initiative comes after Simmons increased full maternity pay from 21 weeks to 26 weeks within the last year, as well as reducing the eligibility for maternity pay, from two years to six months.
Taylor, who has worked reduced hours for around six years, said: "It has worked great from my perspective. I certainly have not seen that it has been a hindrance to my practice or that I have been remunerated unfairly by the firm. Instead it has given me exactly the kind of balance I was looking for."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Subsidiaries in Belgium and France Sued by DRC Over Conflict Minerals
2 minute readDLA Piper, Heuking & Other Key Moves as German Legal Market Reshuffles Ahead of 2025
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250