Simmons revamps flexible working scheme for fee earners
Simmons & Simmons has overhauled its flexible working scheme to make it easier for transactional lawyers to work reduced hours. The firm is set to pilot a new scheme that will allow all fee earners, including partners, to agree a percentage reduction in their annual working hours, with the flexibility to take the time off as they choose rather than being committed to working a certain number of hours each week.
September 28, 2011 at 07:03 PM
2 minute read
Simmons & Simmons has overhauled its flexible working scheme to make it easier for transactional lawyers to work reduced hours.
The firm is set to pilot a new scheme that will allow all fee earners, including partners, to agree a percentage reduction in their annual working hours, with the flexibility to take the time off as they choose rather than being committed to working a certain number of hours each week.
It is intended to make it easier for transactional lawyers to work flexibly by, for example, allowing them to work full-time on a deal and then to take time off between transactions.
Roughly 10% of Simmons' partnership and some 20% of associates have already signed up to formal flexible working arrangements but, to date, these have centred on working a set number of days per week.
By relaxing the scheme the firm hopes to discourage departures for smaller firms perceived to have a better work/life balance and, in the longer term, increase the number of women in its partnership.
The initiative, which has been spearheaded by City employment partner Julian Taylor, will be open to both male and female lawyers. Respective practice group heads will be charged with agreeing each lawyer's schedule.
Simmons managing partner Jeremy Hoyland (pictured) said: "The goal in the long term with increasing flexibility is to preserve talent in the firm, ensuring our best lawyers remain and can be promoted. It marks a major change for the firm, as we are showing that we no longer view flexible working solely as a diversity issue but as a management priority."
The initiative comes after Simmons increased full maternity pay from 21 weeks to 26 weeks within the last year, as well as reducing the eligibility for maternity pay, from two years to six months.
Taylor, who has worked reduced hours for around six years, said: "It has worked great from my perspective. I certainly have not seen that it has been a hindrance to my practice or that I have been remunerated unfairly by the firm. Instead it has given me exactly the kind of balance I was looking for."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore Litigators Shift Competitive Landscape as Another Senior Duo Sets Up Own Shop
US Judge Allows $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit Against Sierra Leone to Proceed
2 minute readLondon Trial Against BHP Alleges ‘Red Flags’ Leading up to Brazil Mining Disaster Were Ignored
Trending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250