Slaughters to lead top-level review of English rugby's governing body
Slaughter and May has been instructed by the Rugby Football Union (RFU) to undertake a review of its corporate governance amid intense media scrutiny of the top levels of English rugby's governing body. The review, which will be led by Slaughters corporate partner Nigel Boardman, will aim to assess the effectiveness of current practice at the RFU, in particular the relationship between its board of directors and council.
September 29, 2011 at 10:09 AM
3 minute read
Slaughter and May has been instructed by the Rugby Football Union (RFU) to undertake a review of its corporate governance amid intense media scrutiny of the top levels of English rugby's governing body.
The review, which will be led by Slaughters corporate partner Nigel Boardman, will aim to assess the effectiveness of current practice at the RFU, in particular the relationship between its board of directors and council.
The news comes as a result of an earlier investigation by RFU disciplinary officer Judge Jeff Blackett into the sacking of RFU chief executive officer John Steele in June and the ensuing resignation of chairman Martyn Thomas in July.
Thomas has remained at the RFU as acting CEO, despite receiving a vote of no confidence at the beginning of September.
The Blackett report, which was considered at a RFU board meeting in July, was critical of the governing body's management and of Thomas's handling of the recruitment of a new performance director.
An RFU spokesperson commented: "The RFU has readily agreed to an independent audit of its corporate governance, which was one of the recommendations in the Blackett report. The process is now ongoing."
Earlier this month the RFU approved the review's terms of reference, which include establishing whether current practice at the RFU complies with the body's own rules and regulations, government legislation and the Sport and Recreation Alliance's voluntary code of good governance.
The results of the report, which will be presented to the RFU council in December, will offer advice on the correct powers of relevant stakeholders and outline recommended amendments to the RFU's rules and regulations and current practice.
It will draw on existing RFU materials and documentation, written submissions from key stakeholders and oral submissions by interviews with certain key stakeholders.
Interviews and written submissions are due to be completed in October, with the report set to be submitted to the RFU for distribution among its council members at the end of November.
In a letter to colleagues, RFU chairman Paul Murphy said: "It is important to stress that the RFU has not become a poor organisation and the lessons learned from the events of the last few months will make us stronger. Mistakes have been made and some things could have been done better, but the important point is take appropriate action to ensure they are not repeated."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Are You Not Profiting From Postmasters’ Misery?’—Politicians Grill HSF, Dentons on Post Office Conduct
'Not a Good Look'—FCA Fines Barclays £40M But Accused of Incompetence
Gibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250