Mallesons partners voice support for tie-up with China leader King & Wood
Mallesons Stephen Jaques is pushing forward with plans for a tie-up with top Chinese law firm King & Wood in what could mark a highly significant union in the Asia-Pacific market. The top-tier Australian firm's partners were given the chance to air their views about the potential union at a meeting in Sydney last month, with discussions between the two firms now set to progress after partners offered broad support for a tie-up.
October 03, 2011 at 07:47 AM
3 minute read
Mallesons Stephen Jaques is pushing forward with plans for a tie-up with top Chinese law firm King & Wood in what could mark a highly significant union in the Asia-Pacific market.
The top-tier Australian firm's partners were given the chance to air their views about the potential union at a meeting in Sydney last month, with discussions between the two firms now set to progress after partners offered broad support for a tie-up.
Partner feedback on a potential deal is now set to be presented to Mallesons' management at the end of November.
The talks, which first emerged in July, could see the firms enter into a combination via a Swiss verein structure, allowing them to maintain separate finances while centralising some functions and operating under one name.
Due to Chinese regulatory constraints, Mallesons and King & Wood would not be able to enter into a full merger; however, if a tie-up was to go ahead, an alternative arrangement could see the firms separately merge their Australia, Hong Kong and China operations.
One Mallesons partner said: "We are still talking and it has progressed and is progressing. The idea is that we will eventually merge to the extent that we can, but that would be in a few years."
Profits per equity partner (PEP) at Mallesons are understood to be higher than that of King & Wood, one issue which could prove a potential stumbling block. In 2009-10 Mallesons' average PEP stood at A$1.2m (£750,000), while according to The Australian Financial Review, the firm's best-paid partners received as much as A$1.9m (£1.2m) for 2010-11.
Mallesons currently has around 1,000 legal staff working across nine offices, including four outside Australia in Hong Kong, Shanghai, Beijing and London. King & Wood, which has an existing strategic alliance with Australia's Gilbert + Tobin, has around 950 legal staff based in 13 offices in China, New York, Tokyo and Palo Alto.
The developments come after Ashurst and Australia's Blake Dawson last week (26 September) finalised the terms of their tie-up.
The deal will see the two firms combine their businesses in Asia from March 2012, with the 190-partner Blakes rebranding entirely under the Ashurst name both in Asia and Australia from the same point.
The full merger, which will need to go to a further vote by both partnerships in early 2014, is subject to Blakes bringing its finances in line with Ashurst.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Simpson Thacher and Brazilian Duo Ride Uptick in LatAm M&A
Kim & Chang, Freshfields, A&O Shearman Take Top Spots for Highest Collective Deal Value as APAC M&A Grew By Just 1% in 2024
Blocking of $14B Nippon US Steel Deal Will Not Dampen Japan-U.S. M&A, Lawyers Say
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250