Dundas and Bircham Dyson Bell call off merger discussions
Dundas & Wilson and Bircham Dyson Bell have ended their merger discussions after deciding against a combination. The firms announced today (10 October) that they have concluded exploratory discussions about a tie-up after mutually coming to a decision not to seek partner approval for a potential merger.
October 10, 2011 at 12:10 PM
2 minute read
Dundas & Wilson and Bircham Dyson Bell have ended their merger discussions after deciding against a combination.
The firms announced today (10 October) that they have concluded exploratory discussions about a tie-up after mutually coming to a decision not to seek partner approval for a potential merger.
The firms said in a joint statement: "Dundas & Wilson and Bircham Dyson Bell have concluded their talks and have decided not to pursue a merger of their two firms. Collaboration on individual projects, particularly in the area of major infrastructure and energy projects, will continue."
Dundas managing partner Donald Shaw (pictured) added: "We hold one another in high regard and are naturally disappointed that serious and worthwhile discussions between us have not been more fruitful. However, as we stated, these were just steps to establish whether our previous successes in collaborating on client matters could be further developed by integrating our practices."
Bircham managing partner Guy Vincent said: "Combining two well-established and successful firms is always challenging even when, as is certainly the case here, there is substantial goodwill and business potential.
"Both firms have independently and jointly concluded that, due to differences in their operating models, the downsides outweigh the potential upsides. Although we will not be merging, we remain on excellent terms and look forward to working together on appropriate projects."
The firms first confirmed that they had held discussions about a formal tie-up last month (20 September).
For Dundas, which has offices in Edinburgh and Glasgow, a combination could have bolstered its London presence, which it has previously set out an intention to grow. The Scots firm is the UK's 49th largest law firm after seeing turnover rise 1.6% during the 2010-11 financial year to £62m, alongside a 2.5% increase in profits per equity partner (PEP) to £325,000. The firm has around 280 lawyers and approximately 80 partners.
Bircham, a single-office firm based in London's Westminster, has around 170 lawyers including almost 50 partners, and reported revenues of £31.9m for 2009-10, when PEP stood at £232,000.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![A&O Shearman, White & Case Advise on €1.2B Public Takeover of German Steel Giant Salzgitter A&O Shearman, White & Case Advise on €1.2B Public Takeover of German Steel Giant Salzgitter](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2023/11/Money-falling-767x633-2.jpg)
A&O Shearman, White & Case Advise on €1.2B Public Takeover of German Steel Giant Salzgitter
3 minute read![Bredin, Cleary Guide Sanofi’s €3B Share Buyback From L’Oreal Bredin, Cleary Guide Sanofi’s €3B Share Buyback From L’Oreal](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/403/2023/06/Sanofi-767x633.jpg)
![Slaughter and May and A&O Shearman Advise as Latest UK Company Goes American Slaughter and May and A&O Shearman Advise as Latest UK Company Goes American](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/7e/38/53d3f7644145b079ac62b0d232ea/adobestock-1036916432-767x633.jpg)
Slaughter and May and A&O Shearman Advise as Latest UK Company Goes American
3 minute read![Trio of Firms Act On Chinese Insurer Ping An's $1.7B Stake Acquisition In Healthcare Arm Trio of Firms Act On Chinese Insurer Ping An's $1.7B Stake Acquisition In Healthcare Arm](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2023/08/China-Investment-767x633-1.jpg)
Trio of Firms Act On Chinese Insurer Ping An's $1.7B Stake Acquisition In Healthcare Arm
Trending Stories
- 1DeepSeek Isn’t Yet Impacting Legal Tech Development. But That Could Soon Change.
- 2'Landmark' New York Commission Set to Study Overburdened, Under-Resourced Family Courts
- 3Wave of Commercial Real Estate Refinance Could Drown Property Owners
- 4Redeveloping Real Estate After Natural Disasters: Challenges, Strategies and Opportunities
- 5Calif. Fires Should Serve as a Reminder to Fla.’s Commercial Landlords and Tenants Not to Be Complacent
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250