Halliwells fixed-share partners level new claims at equity partners
A group of ex-Halliwells partners have been issued with a letter by former fixed-share members threatening legal action on the grounds of misrepresentation. The letter, which was sent by Irwin Mitchell on behalf of 14 former Halliwells fixed-share partners, levels a number of complaints at the equity partners who each received a share of the defunct firm's controversial £24.5m ''reverse premium' property payout.
October 14, 2011 at 10:01 AM
3 minute read
A group of ex-Halliwells partners have been issued with a letter by former fixed-share members threatening legal action on the grounds of misrepresentation.
The letter, which was sent by Irwin Mitchell on behalf of 14 former Halliwells fixed-share partners, levels a number of complaints at the equity partners who each received a share of the defunct firm's controversial £24.5m ''reverse premium' property payout.
The letter states that the equity partners who accepted the payment failed to act in good faith relating to the other members of the partnership.
The payout was received in 2007 when the firm sold a stake in the freehold of its new office in Spinningfields, Manchester. The equity partners then distributed the money among themselves – a move that has been criticised for contributing to the firm's subsequent financial difficulties.
The letter goes on to accuse the partners of changing the firm's limited liability partnership (LLP) deed shortly before it collapsed in order to make the allocation of terminal loss relief more favourable for full equity partners.
As previously reported by Legal Week, former Halliwells' partners are in negotiations with HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) about the defunct firm's taxable profits and losses during the financial year ending 30 April 2010 and for the period up to its collapse on 20 July that year.
Partners are seeking to offset the firm's losses against tax either owed or paid on their earnings, with some estimating that those at the top of the equity when the firm went bust could receive a six-figure sum from HMRC.
The deed is understood to have been changed so that in the event of a loss, equity partners would vote on 1 May 2010 as to how it should be allocated. When the firm made a loss, the partnership voted to allocate any future terminal loss relief on a pro-rata basis, depending on a partner's profit-sharing points.
Commenting on the letter, one ex-Halliwells equity partner said: "The LLP deed was changed a number of times during 2010, including clarifying and confirming that any tax losses would be allocated by a resolution of those who were equity partners on the 1 May 2010.
"Subsequently, the tax losses were allocated on a pro rata basis depending on a partner's profit sharing points in accordance with a vote pursuant to the LLP deed and the requirements of tax legislation."
In a statement, Irwin Mitchell partner Chris Jones said: "Our clients are aware of the recent statements in the press. We and they have spent a significant amount of time investigating the actions of the full members of the LLP in the period to the date of the administration order and those investigations are continuing. A considerable amount of information is being, and will continue to be, sought in this regard.
"The aim of the investigations is to ascertain our clients' position as regards the conduct of the full members prior to administration given both the potential claims against our clients and the losses incurred by them as a result of the administration of the LLP. Our clients wish to reserve their position until these investigations have been completed."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClaus von Wobeser: Mexico's ‘Godfather of Arbitration’ Becomes Firm’s Honorary Chair
Slaughter and May Leads As Government Buys Back £6 Billion of Military Homes
2 minute readLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Trending Stories
- 1Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 2CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 3Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 4Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
- 5The Week in Data Jan. 21: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250