Hogan Lovells puts global growth at top of agenda in three-year strategy
Hogan Lovells is putting international expansion and client development at the centre of its first post-merger strategy review. The transatlantic law firm has drawn up a list of key jurisdictions it would like to enter by the close of December 2014 as part of a review conducted by co-chief executives Warren Gorrell and David Harris.
October 19, 2011 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
Transatlantic firm targets new territories in post-merger review
Hogan Lovells is putting international expansion and client development at the centre of its first post-merger strategy review.
The transatlantic law firm has drawn up a list of key jurisdictions it would like to enter by the close of December 2014 as part of a review conducted by co-chief executives Warren Gorrell and David Harris (pictured).
Brazil, Qatar and Indonesia have all been earmarked for office launches during the next three years, with the firm also considering opening in Australia and South Korea.
Hogan Lovells already has four offices across the Middle East, while it services Brazil from a base in Venezuela, with Indonesia – where it would need to form an association with a local firm in order to practise – currently accessed via two small offices in Vietnam.
Elsewhere, the firm plans to grow its New York and London corporate practices, which critics argue are still punching below their weight.
The review has also seen Hogan Lovells devise a three-tier client programme. The top tier includes the closest client relationships such as Ford and SABMiller, which already use the firm across multiple practices and geographies. These clients could be offered a wider range of alternative billing arrangements or, potentially, collaboration with legal process outsourcers if requested.
Meanwhile, the firm is expected to push cross-selling for clients in the second and third tiers across multiple practice areas and into the firm's main geographic markets.
One partner commented: "Cross-selling remains one of the top priorities at the firm – many of the relationships we have are still too patchy. A lot of relationships used to be corporate-led, but post-recession areas like regulatory are shifting into focus."
Separately, it has emerged that the firm has disbanded the implementation committee formed to oversee integration of the merger between Lovells and Hogan & Hartson, which went live in May 2010.
Harris said: "Eighteen months have passed since the merger went live and integration has gone very well. Our strategic focus continues to be on clients, both in terms of winning new opportunities and cross-selling to our existing clients. We are also reviewing opportunities for further expansion in line with the needs of our clients, particularly in Asia, the Middle East and Latin America."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on the 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readLetter From Asia: Will Big Law Ever Bother to Understand Asia Again?
Simpson Thacher, Nishimura, Mori Hamada Assist on KKR's $4B Winning Bid in Japan
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250