SRA to assign 'relationship managers' to biggest UK law firms in City push
The UK's largest law firms are set to receive individually tailored monitoring from the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), as the regulator continues its efforts to tighten its links with City firms. In a report issued today (21 October), the SRA has outlined plans to assign firms above a certain size their own relationship manager to identify, assesses and address risks under the new 'outcomes-focused' regulation regime.
October 21, 2011 at 07:21 AM
3 minute read
The UK's largest law firms are set to receive individually tailored monitoring from the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), as the regulator continues its efforts to tighten its links with City firms.
In a report issued today (21 October), the SRA has outlined plans to assign firms above a certain size their own relationship manager to identify, assesses and address risks under the new 'outcomes-focused' regulation regime.
The move follows a year-long pilot involving 19 volunteer firms, which has seen SRA reach the conclusion that larger and global outfits have "a greater range of issues that require greater engagement to understand." The exact size and revenue criteria for involvement in the new initiative has not yet been confirmed.
The SRA will now assess firms and score them according to their potential impact on the authority's regulatory objectives, with those that are considered 'high risk' then required to work with a relationship manager.
The SRA launched the relationship management pilot in autumn last year, with the participating firms divided into six groups: global and City, national, regional, niche, local and sole practitioner, in an effort to identify where the most support was needed.
Eight relationship managers (pictured) have been working with the 19 firms across a five-step 'cycle of engagement' that has involved the identification, assessment and resolution of risks in each outfit.
The report found that regulatory issues for smaller firms were generally less complex and could be resolved without the use of an ongoing relationship manager.
SRA relationship manager Suchitra Hammond said: "The feedback from all firms was overwhelmingly positive. They saw relationship management as an appropriate alternative to our previous engagement processes, which was evident from the way in which they engaged with us as part of the pilot.
"Because of the resource-intensive nature of relationship management, we had taken the view that it would be most fitting for large and commercial firms. The evidence we've collected since we started the pilot proves this to be the case, so we will be rolling out the programme to work with these practices in this way."
The report comes shortly after after the recent implementation of the new regulatory regime, which came into force on 6 October, which has seen the replacement of the former system of prescriptive rules-based regulation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMoFo Launches in Amsterdam: Exclusive Interview with Global Chair Eric McCrath
2 minute readClifford Chance Boosts Private Credit Offering With Mayer Brown Partner Duo
2 minute readEx-Mayer Brown Corporate Lawyer Leads Race for German Chancellor in Snap Election
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250