Macfarlanes accounts show top earner took home £2.2m for 2010-11
Macfarlanes' highest-paid member earned a £2.2m share of the firm's profits during the last financial year - almost double the equivalent figure in 2009-10 of £1.15m. The figure, which includes payments made in relation to the partner's retirement, is contained within Macfarlanes' limited liability partnership (LLP) accounts, which were recently filed with Companies House.
October 28, 2011 at 11:15 AM
2 minute read
Macfarlanes' highest-paid member earned a £2.2m share of the firm's profits during the last financial year – almost double the equivalent figure in 2009-10 of £1.15m.
The figure, which includes payments made in relation to the partner's retirement, is contained within Macfarlanes' limited liability partnership (LLP) accounts, which were recently filed with Companies House.
The accounts also reveal that capital contributions from members were significantly lower in 2010-11 than the previous year, standing at £200,000 compared with £1.25m in 2009-10.
Profits available for division among members fell from £30.6m in 2009-10 to £27.9m this year; however, operating profit increased marginally from £45.5m to £46.3m before tax.
The average number of members remained broadly static at 74 compared with 75 in 2009-10, while overall staff numbers fell slightly from 420 last year to 408 in 2010-11. Staff costs also dropped marginally, with wages and salaries dipping from £24.4m in 2009-10 to £24.1m in 2010-11.
Macfarlanes saw revenue grow 2.5% to £94.7m in 2010-11, up from £92.4m the previous year, while profits per equity partner increased 4.6% to £752,000 from £719,000 in 2009-10.
Macfarlanes senior partner Charles Martin said: "Our accounts are in accordance with what we reported at the end of last year, which was exactly where we expected to be, and as we approach the half-year point next week business is fine.
"I would be surprised if anyone is having a great time and I'm sure people are finding it pretty tough. I think most results will fall somewhere between ok and tough at the end of 2011-12."
- Click here for the latest Macfarlanes briefings from Legal Week Law
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMoFo Launches in Amsterdam: Exclusive Interview with Global Chair Eric McCrath
2 minute readClifford Chance Boosts Private Credit Offering With Mayer Brown Partner Duo
2 minute readEx-Mayer Brown Corporate Lawyer Leads Race for German Chancellor in Snap Election
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Fenwick and Baker & Hostetler Add DC Partners, as Venable and Brownstein Hire Policy Advisers
- 2H&R Block Accused of Negligence in Data Breach Suit
- 3Apple Disputes 'Efforts to Manufacture' Imaging Sensor Claims Against iPhone 15 Technology
- 4Following Treasury Hack, Do Federal Cybersecurity Standards Need an Update?
- 5Former Capital One Deputy GC Takes Legal Reins of AIG Spinoff
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250