City elite give a little ground on fees but some firms still hiking rates
Charge-out rates at the City's top firms have remained broadly static throughout 2011, with leading firms coming under pressure to reduce rates. New research carried out by costs lawyer Jim Diamond shows magic circle firms have reduced partner charge-out rates marginally, with average rates falling by 8% at the lower end of the range and 3% at the top in 2011. The reductions equate to an average partner hourly rate in the magic circle of between £600 and £700, down from a range of £650 to £725 in 2010.
November 23, 2011 at 07:03 PM
5 minute read
Jim Diamond survey shows renewed pressure on fees as LW research underlines client concerns over costs
Charge-out rates at the City's top firms have remained broadly static throughout 2011, with leading firms coming under pressure to reduce rates.
New research carried out by costs lawyer Jim Diamond shows magic circle firms have reduced partner charge-out rates marginally, with average rates falling by 8% at the lower end of the range and 3% at the top in 2011. The reductions equate to an average partner hourly rate in the magic circle of between £600 and £700, down from a range of £650 to £725 in 2010.
At major City firms, base rates have leapt 13% at partner level to £425 an hour, up from around £375 in 2010; however, top-end pricing dropped by around 6%, to £600 from £640 last year.
There have been larger increases in fees at the junior lawyer level, where City firms outside the magic circle are now charging on average 14% more for lawyers with five years' post-qualification experience than last year, and newly-qualified rates have risen 19%.
Slaughter and May practice partner Paul Olney (pictured) said: "It wouldn't surprise me if there is a greater focus on associate rates than before. Care is needed in looking at rates quoted by firms as there is considerable variation according to the client, type of work and sector."
Diamond's findings show that the lowest hourly charge-out rate for a partner at a magic circle firm has increased by around 60% since 2003, when it stood at £375 compared with £600 today. With the exception of 2009, rates have broadly increased every year for which data is available.
Diamond commented: "The drop in charge-out rates in 2009 was a knee-jerk reaction because there was so little work around. However, the huge jump back in 2010 was a reflection of the lack of transparency in the market and a lack of action from in-house counsel to try and keep the rates down, which is why the same sky-high prices have remained this year."
The figures are also reflected in new research from Legal Week Intelligence, which separately shows that Mills & Reeve and Squire Sanders Hammonds are the best firms for alternative billing practices, according to clients.
Legal Week's Client Satisfaction Report demonstrates the dissatisfaction felt by clients with regards to their advisers' alternative billing practices on a broader level, with national firms outstripping their higher-charging City, US and international counterparts.
The flagship research, which canvassed the opinion of more than 1,000 clients including 78 FTSE 100 companies, saw national firms scoring an average of 6.31 out of 10 for their billing practices.
Mills & Reeve emerged as the top performer in this category, with 7.71 out of 10, followed by Squire Sanders Hammonds and Dundas & Wilson. US firms Latham & Watkins and White & Case outperformed their City rivals to complete the top five.
Among the international firms, Norton Rose topped the alternative billing rankings with a score of 6.73, followed by DLA Piper on 6.36 and CMS Cameron McKenna with 6.34. Of the magic circle, only Slaughters scored higher than the group average score of 5.7.
Norton Rose chief executive Peter Martyr commented: "We see ourselves as part of our clients' business. In a difficult market, we think it is important to find solutions together."
CMS senior partner Dick Tyler added: "Our clients are looking for transparent billing arrangements that reflect the value of the work that we do. They do not often want us to send out a bill with '£x' multiplied by the hours, they want some context to it."
The report found that clients typically rate law firms higher on quality than they do on cost issues. Weil Gotshal & Manges emerged as the top firm overall, with a score of 8.6 out of 10, but was the second-lowest scoring firm in terms of alternative billing. Other strong performers in the overall rankings include Reed Smith and Hogan Lovells.
———————————————————————————————————————————————–
Average charge-out rates
Magic circle partner: £600-£700
Magic circle newly-qualified (NQ) lawyer: £300
City firm partner (outside the magic circle): £425-£600
City firm NQ to 2 years' post-qualification experience (PQE): £215-£300
Major regional and national firm partner: £325-£450
Major regional and national firm NQ-2 PQE: £175-£240
Source: Jim Diamond's Hourly Rate Survey 2011
———————————————————————————————————————————————–
The full Client Satisfaction Report will be published in December. For more information contact [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Six Korean Firm Bae, Kim & Lee Boosts Disputes Offering With Former A&O Lifer
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose, Greenberg Traurig, White & Case Lead Major Deals in Asia
Aviation Attorney and Pilot Analyzes Jeju Air Crash, Potential Litigation Issues
Shoosmiths Hires Two Locke Lord London Partners as Part of a Six-Strong IP Team
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Letter From London: 5 Predictions for Big Law in 2025, Plus 5 More Risky Ones
- 2Crypto Groups Sue IRS Over Decentralized Finance Reporting Rule
- 3Jenner Brings Back Zachary Schauf from DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel
- 4'Erroneous Assumption'?: Apple Challenges DOJ Antitrust Remedy in Google Search Monopoly Case
- 5A Jury to Determine Whether Stairs Were Defectively Designed in Injury Case, State Appellate Court Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250