BDO applies to be named liquidator as Halliwells wind-up continues
BDO has applied to be appointed as liquidator of defunct law firm Halliwells, with the organisation, currently Halliwells' administrator, taking the first steps towards liquidating the failed firm's limited liability partnership (LLP). BDO expects a decision on its application in the New Year but CMS Cameron McKenna issued a letter on behalf of the company last month stating BDO's intention to terminate its appointment as administrator and to instead become the failed firm's liquidator.
December 07, 2011 at 10:51 AM
3 minute read
BDO has applied to be appointed as liquidator of defunct law firm Halliwells, with the organisation, currently Halliwells' administrator, taking the first steps towards liquidating the failed firm's limited liability partnership (LLP).
BDO expects a decision on its application in the New Year but CMS Cameron McKenna issued a letter on behalf of the company last month stating BDO's intention to terminate its appointment as administrator and to instead become the failed firm's liquidator.
The letter, dated 15 November and sent to the four remaining members of the defunct firm's limited liability partnership (LLP) still registered at Companies House, does not give a date for when the liquidation will take place.
BDO's term overseeing the administration of Halliwells is due to end on 19 January 2012, after the professional services firm was granted a six month extension to its term in July 2011.
If appointed as liquidator by secured creditor The Royal Bank of Scotland, BDO will gain access to a wider range of powers, most notably under sections 213 and 214 of the Insolvency Act 1986 – fraudulent trading and wrongful trading.
Under section 214A, for example, former partners could potentially be liable to repay any drawings paid out from the LLP in the two years before Halliwells went into administration.
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer restructuring and insolvency partner Richard Tett commented: "After administration, liquidation is the natural next step in the winding up of a defunct business. However, it does also open up a number of additional potential remedies for liquidators to be able to seek financial restitution on behalf of the creditors."
Partnership law specialist Roderick I'Anson Banks added: "It looks to me as though we may be about to enter into a more hostile phase where things begin to get interesting in terms of claims by the liquidators against partners and former partners. We may see some cutting-edge litigation as a result."
The news comes after a group of ex-Halliwells partners were issued with letters by former fixed-share members in October, threatening legal action on the grounds of misrepresentation.
The letter, which was sent by Irwin Mitchell on behalf of 14 former Halliwells fixed-share partners, levels a number of complaints at the equity partners who each received a share of the defunct firm's controversial £24.5m ''reverse premium' property payout.
Halliwells went into administration in summer 2010, owing secured creditor Royal Bank of Scotland around £17.7m at the time of its collapse. A progress report in July this year revealed BDO had received claims from unsecured creditors worth £191.5m.
BDO said in a statement: "At a court hearing on Thursday 1st December 2011, BDO Administrators applied for a petition to be issued to put Halliwells into Compulsory Liquidation. The petition will be heard on 12 January 2012."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGibson Dunn Sued by Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
Australian Corporations More Concerned About Class Actions Risk, HSF Report Finds
3 minute readSingapore Oil Tycoon Appeals 17.5 Year Prison Sentence In Fraudulent Trading Case
Charles Russell Speechlys Opens in Milan to Focus on Ultra-High Net Worth Clients
Trending Stories
- 1Litera Acquires Document Automation Startup Offices & Dragons
- 2Patent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
- 3Transforming Dispute Processes in Law: The Impact of Large Language Models
- 4Daniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
- 5Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250