Linklaters set for second partnership restructuring since 2009
Linklaters is set to carry out the second restructuring of its partnership in three years, with some within the firm predicting up to 35 departures from the equity globally over the coming year. The magic circle law firm announced the restructuring to London partners last Friday (2 December), stating that it will consist of a combination of exits and de-equitisations.
December 07, 2011 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
As many as 35 partners affected as City giant launches shake-up
Linklaters is set to carry out the second restructuring of its partnership in three years, with some within the firm predicting up to 35 departures from the equity globally over the coming year.
The magic circle law firm announced the restructuring to London partners last Friday (2 December), stating that it will consist of a combination of exits and de-equitisations.
No formal indication of numbers was given to partners at the meeting; however, informally, partners expect up to 35 equity partners to be affected globally, with London expected to bear the brunt of the shake-up.
Up to 20 partners are thought likely to go in London according to one partner in the firm, with transactional practices expected to be heavily hit. It is unclear how many will be de-equitised.
The exercise marks the firm's first formal restructuring since the Linklaters' New World programme in 2009, which resulted in more than 35 partners going, as well as substantial staff redundancies.
Although Linklaters has no current plans for associate redundancies, it is hoping to redeploy lawyers in transactional practices that have been badly affected by the latest economic downturn to busier groups in order to protect utilisation and avoid job cuts.
The firm has already begun talking to junior lawyers about the possibility of moving to practices still seeing high levels of activity, such as restructuring and insolvency, litigation and regulatory.
The predicted scale of the partner cuts has come as a surprise to many current and former Linklaters partners, with 35 partners equating to around 8% of the 436 equity partners the firm had at the close of the last financial year. According to Legal Week's top 50 survey for 2010-11, the firm had a total of 467 partners at the end of the year, with an average of 125 at the top of the equity throughout the year.
One partner commented: "Just under half of the entire partnership is based in London, and this simply does not reflect where revenues are coming from at present. Firm management has said that its focus will be on the emerging markets, hence the heavyweight relocations to Asia and the partner culls."
One former partner said: "It took us some time to recover from the 2009 restructuring and I think it is ill-advised to embark on another such exercise so shortly afterwards."
The restructuring comes as a review of Linklaters' lockstep, launched earlier this year, is also expected to see the firm swell its salaried partner rank – a shift from its previous stance of moving towards a "substantially all-equity partnership".
Commenting on the firm's plans, managing partner Simon Davies (pictured) said: "We continually look at our business and partner base in the context of the markets and our clients' needs. A natural part of this process includes some partners moving on."
He added: "Decisions about partner departures are entirely personal to the individual and it is therefore inappropriate to comment on speculative numbers involved. Where decisions are taken by the firm, they are taken reluctantly and only ever in the long-term interests of the firm."
Linklaters' plans come as law firms brace themselves for a difficult 2012, with the crisis in the eurozone expected to prompt other firms to look at both their partner and lawyer numbers.
Simmons & Simmons has changed its partnership deed to make payouts less generous to partners being managed out, while Legal Week reported last week that Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer was asking one London real estate partner to leave as a result of the economic climate. Allen & Overy, meanwhile, is set to start managing its equity for the first time since its restructuring in the wake of the 2008 credit crunch.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Heavyweights Wrestle in High-Stakes Sale of Venezuela’s Citgo
Cleary vs. White & Case: NYC Showdown Over $5 Billion Brazilian Bankruptcy
Singapore's Drew & Napier Secures $3.5B Award in Civil Suit
Trending Stories
- 1State Budget Proposal Includes More Money for Courts—for Now
- 2$5 Million Settlement Reached With Stone Academy
- 3$15K Family Vacation Turned 'Colossal Nightmare': Lawsuit Filed Against Vail Ski Resorts
- 4Prepare Your Entries! The California Legal Awards Have a New, February Deadline
- 5DOJ Files Antitrust Suit to Block Amex GBT's Acquisition of Competitor
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250