Italian independent Grimaldi e Associati votes to dissolve
Italian independent Grimaldi e Associati has voted to dissolve at the end of this month, with approximately 100 lawyers and support staff set to lose their jobs. The planned dissolution, which was voted through by partners at a meeting earlier this month, comes after corporate chief Roberto Cappelli left the firm last month alongside an 11-lawyer team to join Italian leader Gianni Origoni Grippo & Partners.
December 14, 2011 at 05:03 AM
2 minute read
Italian independent Grimaldi e Associati has voted to dissolve at the end of this month, with approximately 100 lawyers and support staff set to lose their jobs.
The planned dissolution, which was voted through by partners at a meeting earlier this month, comes after corporate chief Roberto Cappelli left the firm last month alongside an 11-lawyer team to join Italian leader Gianni Origoni Grippo & Partners.
The move, which resulted in the firm changing its name to Gianni Origoni Grippo Cappelli & Partners, came as a huge blow to Grimaldi, which had been experiencing falling revenues. Cappelli headed the firm's corporate and M&A practice, as well as serving as deputy chairman of football club AS Roma.
The independent firm was set originally set up in 2002 through a split-off from Clifford Chance in the culmination of a long-running row over the management of the top UK firm's Italian practice.
The five partners who set up Grimaldi were name partner Vittorio Grimaldi, Rome-based Francesco Novelli and Valerio Di Gravio, and Milan partners Roberto Cappelli and Alberto Dubini, who defected alongside 26 lawyers.
With about 17 partners, Grimaldi was one of Italy's larger independent firms, having posted an estimated €27m (£22.8m) in turnover for the 2010 calendar year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFreshfields Name Change Becomes Official as Company with Similar Name Dissolves
2 minute readLeaders at Top French Firms Anticipate Strong M&A Market in 2025 Despite Uncertainty
6 minute readEU Parliament Gives Blessing to New EU Competition Chief Ribera Rodríguez
2 minute readSimpson Thacher Becomes Second Firm to Launch in Luxembourg in 2 Days With A&O Shearman Hires
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Discovery Seeks to Link Yale University to Doctor in Fertility Scandal
- 2On The Move: Energy Infrastructure Pro Joins Moore & Van Allen, Adams & Reese Changes Atlanta Leadership
- 3Miami Attorneys Secure $4M Settlement Despite Insurance Limits
- 4NY Judge Admonished Over Contributions to Progressive Political Causes
- 5Legaltech Rundown: Alexi Launches an AI Litigation Tool, Hotshot Announces Private Equity Practice Courses, and More
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250