King & Wood Mallesons to operate three-strand partnership post merger
The tie-up between Australia's Mallesons Stephen Jaques and China's King & Wood will operate under a three-partnership Swiss verein structure it has emerged, as final details of the combined firm are disclosed. The combination will see three separate partnerships created in Australia, China and Hong Kong as a result of Chinese regulatory constraints that meaning the firms cannot combine financially in a full merger.
December 15, 2011 at 08:08 AM
3 minute read
The tie-up between Australia's Mallesons Stephen Jaques and China's King & Wood will operate under a three-partnership Swiss verein structure it has emerged, as final details of the combined firm are disclosed.
The combination will see three separate partnerships created in Australia, China and Hong Kong as a result of Chinese regulatory constraints that mean the firms cannot combine financially in a full merger.
Mallesons' Beijing and Shanghai offices will relocate into King & Wood's local premises with all staff given the opportunity to join the combined firm, while both firms' Hong Kong offices will function as one partnership, but remain in separate offices for the time being.
The news comes after it was announced earlier this month that the firm will operate under the banner King & Wood Mallesons, with the deal set to go live effective 1 March 2012.
The combination received more than 95% partner backing from each of the respective firms and will create an outfit with over 380 partners and 1800 lawyers.
Mallesons chief executive Robert Milliner said: "We have been talking with King & Wood since late November last year, so this has been a long and carefully thought out proposition to not only make sure that we were the right fit for each other, but also that the strategy and execution of it would benefit the clients and people of both businesses.
"The world is changing quickly and dramatically and the economic and business axis has moved significantly to Asia. We see this move to create a truly powerful Asian based international firm as a game-changer in the market. Over time we will also look to carry out further expansion in other key markets."
King & Wood chairman Wang Junfeng will become chairman of the combined firm, while Mallesons' partner Stuart Fuller, who is set to take over as the firm's chief executive from Milliner effective 1 January 2012, will become global managing partner and relocate from Sydney to Hong Kong.
King & Wood previously had a strategic alliance with Australia's Gilbert + Tobin, which ended in March this year in light of its talks with Mallesons.
The tie-up will make the joint entity the largest law firm in Asia and the only combined firm able to offer Australian, PRC, Hong Kong and English law under a common brand.
Profits per equity partner (PEP) at Mallesons are understood to be higher than that of King & Wood. In 2009-10 Mallesons' average PEP stood at A$1.2m (£750,000), while according to The Australian Financial Review, the firm's best-paid partners received as much as A$1.9m (£1.2m) for 2010-11.
Mallesons currently has around 1,000 legal staff working across nine offices, including four outside Australia in Hong Kong, Shanghai, Beijing and London.
Meanwhile, King & Wood has around 950 legal staff across 13 offices in China, New York, Tokyo and Palo Alto.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on the 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readLetter From Asia: Will Big Law Ever Bother to Understand Asia Again?
Simpson Thacher, Nishimura, Mori Hamada Assist on KKR's $4B Winning Bid in Japan
Trending Stories
- 1Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 2'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 3Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 4Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 5Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250