BNP adds City firms to panel as RBS prepares for tough adviser review
BNP Paribas has confirmed the line-up of law firms on its new global legal panel, with Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Herbert Smith winning places. Details of the panel have been confirmed as leading firms predict an extensive overhaul of the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) legal panel, with the bank's deputy general counsel John Collins and GC for corporate and M&A Rushad Abadan set to kick off a review in the coming months.
January 12, 2012 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
Hard negotiations on the way in this year's round of bank reviews
BNP Paribas has confirmed the line-up of law firms on its new global legal panel, with Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Herbert Smith winning places.
Details of the panel have been confirmed as leading firms predict an extensive overhaul of the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) legal panel, with the bank's deputy general counsel John Collins and GC for corporate and M&A Rushad Abadan set to kick off a review in the coming months.
BNP Paribas launched its review in June with the intention of expanding the roster to take into account its increasingly global reach. In addition to first-time appointments for Freshfields and Herbert Smith, Allen & Overy (A&O), Clifford Chance, Linklaters, Hogan Lovells, Norton Rose, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, White & Case and Gide Loyrette Nouel have all been reappointed to a now 10-strong line-up.
Herbert Smith's appointment to the French bank's roster was widely expected, as a number of the firm's international offices have acted for the bank off-panel, while the review was led by the firm's former Paris banking head, Georges Dirani, who became BNP Paribas' global GC in October 2010.
It is understood Dirani also appointed a number of other firms in certain select practice areas, although he declined to comment further on the exercise.
Separately, RBS is gearing up to invite firms to pitch for its panel, which is due to be agreed later this year and will take effect from January 2013.
RBS, which counts Linklaters as its primary adviser, is known for being particularly tough on rates for panel firms, with some City partners suggesting they frequently bill the bank at a discounted hourly rate of around £350, compared with £450-£500 for other major financial institutions.
A review by Societe Generale concluded last month is also understood to have seen the bank push firms heavily on rates.
During its 2009 review RBS offered firms fast-track access to its panel if they agreed to a 10% cut on 2006 rates. However, some partners suggest the bank, which received a £45bn government bailout, making it the largest UK banking failure, would be hard pushed to continue to squeeze firms on rates given its poor financial position and the predicted loss of thousands of investment banking jobs.
One financial services litigator at a top 10 City firm said: "Realistically, RBS should slash its panel in half. Firms should step up and say that it is not lucrative for them to be on a panel with those rates. But instead I expect that RBS will attempt to cling to its position as a key banking client and continue to push for low rates."
A City finance partner added: "It has got to remain worthwhile for firms to continue to act for [RBS]. Firms may sign up to discounted partner rates but will be unwilling to actually place partners on deals at the rate of a third-year qualified lawyer."
At least 19 firms were appointed to RBS' existing panel, which has been running since 1 January 2010, including Ashurst, A&O, SNR Denton, Linklaters, Berwin Leighton Paisner, Freshfields, Herbert Smith and Norton Rose.
Commenting on the latest process, RBS group GC Chris Campbell (pictured) said: "The review is in its early stages and it is too early to say what size the panel will be, but it does not necessarily follow that it will reduce in size. The team leading the process is currently assessing the panel criteria and will communicate with panel firms in due course."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBroadcom Hires From Nuclear Giant to Appoint French Legal Head
GCs Say They are Getting 'Edged Out' of UK Boardrooms
'I Won’t Name the Firm, But...'—Barratt Redrow's Legal Head on External Counsel Red Flags
Trending Stories
- 1Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 2Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 3'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 4Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 5As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250