Ex-Macfarlanes partner handed jail term for perverting course of justice
Former Macfarlanes banking partner Francis Bridgeman has been sentenced to 12 months in prison after claiming he had been kidnapped in order to avoid being arrested for drink-driving.
January 20, 2012 at 10:51 AM
2 minute read
Former Macfarlanes banking partner Francis Bridgeman has been sentenced to 12 months in prison after claiming he had been kidnapped in order to avoid being arrested for drink-driving.
Bridgeman was sentenced at Lewes Crown Court earlier today (20 January) having been found guilty of perverting the course of justice on 16 December 2011, following a five-day trial at Brighton Crown Court.
Bridgeman crashed – and abandoned – his car in April 2010 while over the limit but told police he had been kidnapped by armed men and driven off at knifepoint with a bag over his head in another vehicle before being dumped in a wood.
His version of events could not be substantiated, with CCTV footage showing him walking drunkenly in London, while the presence of his DNA on the car's airbag showed he must have been driving the car when it crashed.
Detective Constable Emma Penrose-Reed from East Sussex criminal investigation department said: "Francis Bridgeman attempted to create an elaborate web of lies and deceit around his bid to cover up his drink-driving offence and deflect attention away from himself.
"He tried to portray himself as a victim of crime and continually displayed acts of ill health throughout the investigation. But due to the hard work, considerable amount of resources and close liaison with our valuable partners at British Transport Police we were able to discredit his fabricated story and bring him to justice."
Bridgeman's appointment as a member of Macfarlanes limited liability partnership was terminated on 31 July 2011. He joined Macfarlanes in 2009 from Allen & Overy, where he had been a partner since 2000.
In addition to the 12-month sentence Bridgeman was ordered to pay £4,200 in costs and has been banned from driving for 18 months.
Click here for more from the Sussex Police website.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Year, New Ventures: 2025 Kicks Off with Mergers, Alliances, and Hidden Ambitions
5 minute readRajah & Tann Strengthens Shenzhen Offering, Renames International Arbitration Head
Dentons Germany Elects First Gender-Balanced Leaders & Promotions at Noerr, Gleiss Lutz
2 minute readSlaughter and May Leads As Government Buys Back £6 Billion of Military Homes
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Chancery Claims Linking Fox Management to Defamation Liability Clear Hurdle
- 2NJ Managing Partner Survey Indicates Tougher 2024 for Many Law Firms
- 3Southwest Airlines Faces $100M Class Action Over Pay Periods
- 4Firms Saw Slight Declines From Last Year, but Merger Interest Remains High, Managing Partner Survey Reveals
- 5Medicaid Whistleblowers Awarded $37M Plus Interest
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250