Trading in distress - will today's distressed debt be tomorrow's hot alternative asset class?
Old world distressed debt has become a significant opportunity for investment in the UK and Europe in 2012. Shearman's Solomon Noh reports
January 26, 2012 at 07:03 PM
7 minute read
Old world distressed debt has become a significant opportunity for investment in the UK and Europe in 2012. Shearman's Solomon Noh reports
For the past few years a group – composed primarily of US-based hedge funds – has focused with keen interest on potential distressed investment opportunities arising out of the UK and Europe. A number of key players within that group have dedicated an increasing amount of their resources to the UK/European strategy, such as by increasing or reallocating staff. Some have even gone so far as to open offices in London recently in preparation for what many expect will be a flood of distressed bank loans coming to market.
For a variety of capital and regulatory reasons, since the onset of the 2008 financial crisis, US banks have been given incentive to sell off a chunk of their holdings to distressed hedge funds, even at a substantial discount to par, rather than hold the loans with reserves or other impairments to their capital. By contrast, banks in the UK and Europe do not appear to have faced the same sort of pressures or incentives and, in fact, still tend to attribute full value to loans that by most reasonable accounts are severely distressed.
Because many underperforming loans remain marked at par, the market thus far has witnessed a mismatch in expectations between UK/European banks, on the one hand, and distressed investment funds, on the other. Because hedge funds typically only buy assets at a steeply discounted price so as to ensure an acceptable rate of return, the distressed investment activity in the UK/Europe remained stagnant through much of 2011.
Many expect the tide to turn in 2012. For various reasons – including the implementation of Basel III (a global regulatory standard on bank capital adequacy, among other things), which will require banks to hold higher quality capital – analysts anticipate that UK/European banks will need to downsize their balance sheets over the next 18 to 24 months by an astonishing sum, somewhere in the order of €1.5trn (£1.2trn) to €2.5trn (£2trn). It is widely expected that banks will respond with a series (or a rash) of asset sales involving distressed loans as well as non-core assets.
If a spate of loan sales indeed were to materialise, distressed investment funds – estimated to have approximately $150bn (or approximately €200bn (£97bn)) devoted to European 'special situation' strategies – should have an abundant supply of distressed assets from which to choose.
In addition to this inventory of legacy distressed debt, it is expected that fresh supplies of underperforming loans and bonds will continue to surface in the UK/Europe due to the vicious combination of stagnating growth, lack of high-yield financing and a looming wall of debt maturities this year (totalling well in excess of €100bn (£83bn)), all against the backdrop of the sovereign debt crisis. Indeed, some analysts predict that high-yield default rates will more than double, from 2.6% at the end of 2011 to 5.6% in 2012.
Types of distressed investment strategies
This unusual confluence of circumstances may well lead to a wide array of investment opportunities in the UK/Europe for distressed funds. For one, a surge in distressed loan sales would provide fertile ground for distressed debt trading – for funds seeking to purchase at a discount with a view to holding the assets for the long term (with the expectation that the underlying value will recover over time) or those who have no interest other than to buy at a favourable price and flip their investments for a quick profit.
Others may favour so-called loan-to-own strategies, whereby an investor acquires distressed debt with a view to ultimately owning all or a portion of the equity in the borrower/issuer through a debt-for-equity exchange. A debt-for-equity swap can occur through a court process – involving a formal bankruptcy/insolvency filing in which the presiding court would force the exchange upon dissenting creditors so long as certain voting thresholds are met – or a consensual out-of-court restructuring.
Another form of distressed investment which has become more prevalent recently is a synthetic asset transfer. In a synthetic transfer, the transacting parties use derivatives documentation (such as a total return swap) to transfer the value (as well as the risk) underlying the assets without the actual title being transferred between them. Transactions of this type – which can be simple or immensely complicated, depending on the business deal and structure – may be appealing to banks that may be sensitive to appearing to have offloaded their assets to opportunistic hedge funds.
Although the expected surge in distressed investment opportunities in the UK and Europe may appear at first blush to be boundless, there is a caveat: in order to be successful, fund managers likely will need to be well-versed in local law, particularly local insolvency law. Insolvency law tends to be a trap for the unwary, as it often provides for the unwinding of contracts and transfers, renders certain contract provisions unenforceable and imposes sometimes unforeseen risks and burdens (such as through a forced clawback of previously-transferred assets).
Hedge funds making distressed investments will need to be cognisant of the relevant risks. This is true not only in situations involving a formal bankruptcy/insolvency process, but also where the borrower or issuer is insolvent (on a balance sheet basis or is otherwise unable to pay its debts as they come due) or is approaching insolvency, during which time certain transactions with the borrower/issuer are subject to special ex post scrutiny.
There is good news, however, for hedge fund managers seeking to delve into UK/European special situations. First, it is expected that as the involvement of US-based hedge funds becomes more prevalent, restructurings increasingly will take on a US style (meaning restructurings are likely to become more aggressive and fast-paced, among other things).
Moreover, it is likely that these hedge funds more often will be working alongside or negotiating against the same group of players with whom they had dealt in the past in relation to US strategies. As a result, distressed fund managers should feel quickly at home in managing UK or European situations.
Second, an increasing number of European jurisdictions are enacting insolvency laws moulded in large part from the US Bankruptcy Code. Therefore, insolvency laws have generally become more predictable than in the past, especially from the perspective of US-based distressed fund managers who are used to dealing with US bankruptcy law. Nonetheless, rules vary in meaningful ways from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
What does this mean for law firms?
This unique market climate demands a law firm that:
- has restructuring professionals with substantial experience in US-style restructuring assignments and who speak the language of the US Bankruptcy Code and thus are able to translate foreign insolvency concepts in ways that US hedge fund managers can readily digest;
- has local insolvency law capability so that clients can get their questions answered without having to retain multiple counsel;
- can combine multiple practice disciplines (such as derivatives, structured finance, M&A as well as bankruptcy/insolvency) to tackle the complexity of some of the transactions being put in place (of the synthetic asset transfer variety, for example); and
- perhaps most importantly, has all of those resources available on a real-time basis in London or elsewhere in Europe so that issues can be addressed and resolved quickly without the need to wait for the work day to start in New York.
The year 2012 has the potential to present a historic opportunity for hedge funds seeking to profit from distressed debt. Law firms that are able to guide their clients through unfamiliar legal regimes in quick, efficient and creative ways will be best placed to advise hedge funds on this expected wave of activity.
Solomon Noh (pictured) is a partner in the finance practice at Shearman & Sterling and recently transferred from the US to London.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250