Quinn Emanuel hikes City revenues by 75% as rapid London growth continues
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan's London office has seen revenues almost double over the last year, as the US firm's burgeoning City base continues its rapid growth since its 2008 launch. The US firm took in London revenues of approximately £22m during the 2011 calendar year, up nearly 80% on the 2010 figure of £12.4m reported in the firm's UK limited liability partnership accounts filed towards the end of last year.
February 01, 2012 at 01:03 AM
2 minute read
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan's London office has seen revenues almost double over the last year, as the US firm's burgeoning City base continues its rapid growth since its 2008 launch.
The US firm took in London revenues of approximately £21.8m during the 2011 calendar year, up 75% on the 2010 figure of £12.4m reported in the firm's UK limited liability partnership accounts filed towards the end of last year.
Operating profit for the year stood at approximately £14.8m, up 76% from the figure of £8.4m posted for 2010. The results mean that profits per equity partner (PEP) at the firm's City arm have risen to approximately £2.47m.
The strong London performance comes alongside another year of global growth for the litigation specialist firm, which saw firmwide revenue rise by 31% to $723m (£461m) during 2011.
The global results, which were announced yesterday (30 January), also show net profits increasing by 34% during 2011 to $490m (£313m). Profits per equity partner (PEP) rose by nearly 15%, resulting in a PEP figure of $4.2m (£2.7m), while revenue per lawyer increased by 14% to $1.4m (£893,000).
Firmwide managing partner John Quinn (pictured) said: "Results like these do not just happen. They were the product of a lot of hard work by a lot of people. They reflect the high demand for our services from an extremely well informed, financially sophisticated legal community."
He added: "Obviously, we could not have achieved financial results like these simply billing by the hour. A significant amount of our revenue came from contingent fee and other alternative fee arrangements, both on the plaintiffs and defense side."
The news comes after a period of aggressive growth for Quinn Emanuel, which in October secured a Moscow launch with the hire of litigation partner duo Ivan Marisin and Vasily Kuznetsov from Dechert, while the firm also recently signed up outgoing Novartis GC Thomas Werlen.
Quinn's London office, which opened for business in April 2008, posted turnover of £7.6m for its first full year in the City in 2009, with its operating profit of £5.7m equating to a profit margin of 75%.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpanish Firm Continues Geographical Diversification With Latest Partner Appointments
MoFo Replenishes Singapore Corporate Partner Loss as Lawyer Returns From Gibson Dunn
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250