Dealmaker: Ian Terry
"Proudest professional moment? Winning the Apple v Apple litigation for Steve Jobs and realising he was now free to take access to music to another level" - Freshfields litigator Ian Terry on the joys of Leeds Crown Court and his ice-skating aspirations
February 09, 2012 at 07:03 PM
4 minute read
Freshfields litigator Ian Terry reflects on the joys of Leeds Crown Court and his ice-skating aspirations
Why did you become a lawyer? As a schoolboy I used to drop in and watch the criminal cases from the public gallery at Leeds Crown Court. I was hooked. It was more interesting than researching in the reference library next door, which was what I was supposed to be doing.
What's the closest you have come to doing something other than law? I was a competitive ice skater in my youth but I gave it up to pursue the law.
Aside from your own firm, which lawyer do you most admire and why? The late Sam Stamler QC. A brilliant legal mind combined with a superb wit. He was wonderful.
What's your proudest professional moment? Winning the Apple v Apple litigation for Steve Jobs and realising he was now free to take access to music to another level.
…and worst day on the job? In my partnership consideration year I sent a letter to my landlords saying their legal advice was wrong, not realising Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer was their adviser. As one might expect, they referred the letter to the firm. Fortunately for me, the relevant partner found it amusing.
What advice would you give to young litigators starting out? Think about how what you have drafted will sound if read out in court.
What's the best part of your job? Working with such talented and entertaining colleagues.
Why become a law firm litigator rather than a barrister? It gives you more direct contact with clients and business, more international travel and a more appealing work environment.
What most annoys you about the legal profession? That we have allowed ourselves to be paid by the hour.
What's the toughest ethical/moral dilemma your job has ever presented you with? I have been lucky enough to navigate through the profession without any dramatic Hamlet moments.
How does the average litigator differ from a deal lawyer? In their preference for a good crisis and a fight.
What's your strongest characteristic…and worst trait? My ability to switch off despite a pathological BlackBerry checking condition.
Aside from your clients, which business figure do you most admire? Warren Buffett. Courageous, individualistic, brilliant results (on the whole), honest about his mistakes and a good, dry sense of humour.
What's your strongest card – technical wizardry or smooth client skills? My client skills. There are no admissions made as to smoothness – I am a Yorkshire man, after all.
What's the worst corporate event you've attended? I avoid them like the plague.
Most memorable case you ever have worked on and why? The Berezovsky litigation. The story of how the jewels of Russian industry ended up in the hands of a few oligarchs, now wealthy beyond dreams. A fascinating and extraordinary period in recent Russian history. You couldn't make it up.
What will be the most significant market trend over the next 12 months? We may see a wave of privacy actions based on nefarious press research methods.
What's your favourite TV depiction of a litigation lawyer? I can't watch those series. The inaccuracies spoil the stories.
What's your favourite item of clothing? Ski gear.
What's your favourite cheese? Perail, a traditional soft creamy sheep's milk cheese from southwest France.
- Visit Legal Week's Dealmaker archive to read more profiles
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFreshfields, MoFo Act on $1.8B TOPPAN Deal As Japan's US Buying Spree Continues
Kirkland Steers Paris-based Antin in ‘Year’s Biggest’ Infrastructure Fund Closing, at €10.2B
3 minute readECJ Ruling Upholds German Ban on Pure Private Equity Investment in Law Firms
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250