Trio of UK firms advise as judge OKs Facebook High Court claim first
Clyde & Co, Stephenson Harwood and Memery Crystal are all advising on a case that has seen what is thought to be the first High Court claim served via Facebook. The case, involving a $2.1m (£1.3m) claim brought by investment-managers AKO Capital and AKO Master Fund against former broker TFS Derivatives, has seen Mr Justice Teare approve the use of Facebook to locate former TFS employee Fabio de Biase.
February 21, 2012 at 07:17 AM
3 minute read
Clyde & Co, Stephenson Harwood and Memery Crystal are all advising on a case that has seen what is thought to be the first High Court claim served via Facebook.
The case, involving a $2.1m (£1.3m) claim brought by investment-managers AKO Capital and AKO Master Fund against former broker TFS Derivatives, has seen Mr Justice Teare approve the use of Facebook to locate former TFS employee Fabio de Biase.
The investment managers allege that the broker significantly overcharged them; however, the broker denies liability and has argued that if held liable, it is entitled to recover a contribution from former AKO employee Anjam Ahmad and de Biase, who handled the relationship.
De Biase has not participated in the proceedings to date and the parties involved have been unable to locate him.
Following pre-trial discussions held last Friday (17 February), Teare granted Stephenson Harwood permission to serve de Biase with a claim via Facebook after it had not been possible to locate him.
The move is understood to mark the first time a claim has been served in the UK using the social networking site at the level of the High Court. A court order and injunction have previously been served via Facebook and Twitter respectively in Britain in lower courts.
Clydes is advising AKO Capital and AKO Master Fund with a team headed up by commercial dispute resolution co-head Neil Jamieson, while Memery Crystal is acting for Ahmad led disputes associate Jenni Jenkins.
Meanwhile, Stephenson Harwood is advising TFS with property litigation partner Paul Thwaite taking the key role.
Teare has given de Biase 14 days to respond to the claim from the day it was served – sometime between last Friday and today (21 February) – an increase on the usual two days permitted due to uncertainty over how often he checks his Facebook account.
The case is expected to go to trial in January 2013.
The news comes after Ahmad was handed a 10-month suspended sentence and fined £50,000 in May 2010 for insider trading at AKO.
On the case, DLA Piper litigation partner Hugh Evans commented: "We live in a world where business at its highest level is conducted 24 hours a day, seven days a week, without regard to national borders and often involving countries with less well developed legal systems as ours.
"The decision to permit service by Facebook demonstrates that the judges in London's commercial court are prepared to deploy modern technology and changing social behaviours in support of litigants needing to serve opponents. In doing so they are continuing to enhance the reputation of London as a venue for the global business community's high value and complex disputes."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSlaughter and May Leads As Government Buys Back £6 Billion of Military Homes
2 minute readLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250