Stephenson Harwood among legal line-up on Tchenguiz SFO judicial review case
Stephenson Harwood and BCL Burton Copeland are advising as property investors Vincent and Robert Tchenguiz contest their arrest by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) in connection with the collapse of Icelandic bank Kaupthing. The brothers yesterday (22 February) won the right to a judicial review of the circumstances surrounding their high-profile arrests last year, after the SFO admitted to mishandling the case.
February 23, 2012 at 09:24 AM
3 minute read
Stephenson Harwood and BCL Burton Copeland are advising as property investors Vincent and Robert Tchenguiz contest their arrest by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) in connection with the collapse of Icelandic bank Kaupthing.
The brothers yesterday (22 February) won the right to a judicial review of the circumstances surrounding their high-profile arrests last year, after the SFO admitted to mishandling the case.
The lawyers acting for Vincent Tchenguiz (pictured) include Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr partner Stephen Pollard, Ben Emmerson QC of Matrix Chambers and Lord Goldsmith QC, the former Attorney General who is now head of European litigation at US law firm Debevoise & Plimpton.
Stephenson Harwood is advising Rawlinson & Hunter, the trustees of the Tchenguiz Family Trust, and several other related parties in relation to the SFO proceedings. The firm's team includes commercial litigation partner Sean Jeffrey, senior associate Richard Garcia and associate Leonie Parkin, with Alun Jones QC of Great James Street instructed as counsel.
White collar crime specialist BCL Burton Copeland is representing Vincent's brother Robert, with partners Ian Burton and Richard Sallybanks leading the firm's team alongside Alex Bailin QC of Matrix Chambers.
James Eadie QC of Blackstone Chambers and barrister Allison Clare of 18 Red Lion Court represented the SFO, while Fiona Barton QC of 5 Essex Court appeared for the City of London Police.
The SFO obtained search warrants against Vincent Tchenguiz last year as part of an investigation into the collapse of Kaupthing, but has now admitted that errors were made in the way the case was handled.
Charlie Monteith, counsel in White & Case's white collar group, said the error does not necessarily render the rest of the evidence gathered outside the warrant inadmissible.
"The defence would have to prove significant bad faith or improper behaviour by the SFO – or the fact that they could not get a fair trial – for the whole case to be thrown out," he explained.
"If the mistake relates to a smallish area of the investigation, this would not necessarily terminate the whole thing. But a lot depends upon whether the SFO have learnt something from the unlawfully seized warrant evidence that could prejudice a fair trial or amount to an abuse."
The Tchenguiz brothers were among nine people arrested in March 2011 as part of the inquiry into Kaupthing, which came under government control in October 2008 after the board of directors stood down. The SFO is no longer contesting the Tchenguizes' judicial review, which is scheduled to take place over three days in May, but has not admitted the search warrants were invalid.
Eversheds commercial dispute resolution partner Mark Surguy commented: "Corruption prosecutions are difficult to mount. Huge volumes of complex evidence are amassed from a wide variety of sources and the data has to be synthesised and understood. This takes time and a great deal of skill. However, allegations of a criminal nature are hugely damaging and if they are not made good, significant reputational loss can be incurred by the individuals or companies on the receiving end."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllX-odus: Why Germany’s Federal Court of Justice and Others Are Leaving X
HSF Defends Bayer on Roundup Class Action as Litigation Comes to an End in Australia
2 minute readNorton Rose Sues South Africa Government Over 'Unreasonable' Ethnicity Score System
3 minute readBirkenstocks: Footwear or Fine Art? German Law Firm SKW Schwarz Steps Up in Court
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250