Linklaters discusses Australian tie-up as Herbert Smith firms up Freehills deal
Linklaters has revised its Asia growth strategy, with partners confirming that the City firm is in discussions with Australian leader Allens Arthur Robinson (AAR) about a potential tie-up. The pair started discussions over a strategic union last year, according to senior lawyers within the magic circle law firm, with one Linklaters partner indicating that an alliance is likely to be the preferred strategy.
March 01, 2012 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
Linklaters has revised its Asia growth strategy, with partners confirming that the City firm is in discussions with Australian leader Allens Arthur Robinson (AAR) about a potential tie-up.
The pair started discussions over a strategic union last year, according to senior lawyers within the magic circle law firm, with one Linklaters partner indicating that an alliance is likely to be the preferred strategy.
An alliance rather than a merger would avoid problems associated with the disparity in profitability between the UK and Australian firm.
AAR, which is an established referral partner of Slaughter and May, posted revenues of $459.5m (£291m) in 2010, with profits per equity partner (PEP) of $1.1m (£696,000), according to the most recent global 100 compiled by The American Lawyer and Legal Week. Linklaters' revenues for 2010-11 stood at £1.2bn alongside PEP of £1.225m.
The Australian firm has 600 lawyers working out of 14 offices across Australia and Asia, including bases in Vietnam, China, Thailand, Indonesia and Singapore. Linklaters, meanwhile, has around 300 lawyers operating across six offices in the region: Beijing, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Tokyo, Singapore and Bangkok.
News of the talks comes after Linklaters' Singapore joint venture partner Allen & Gledhill entered into merger discussions with magic circle rival Allen & Overy (A&O) last year. Allen & Gledhill had previously approached Linklaters about a closer union but the magic circle firm declined due to a lack of demand for Singapore law advice from its international clients.
The AAR discussions make Linklaters the latest UK law firm to target the Australian legal market in recent months.
Ashurst formally united with Blake Dawson under the Ashurst banner yesterday (1 March), while Herbert Smith is currently in talks with Australia's Freehills over a tie-up. Partners expect the deal to take the form of a full financial merger, but with each partnership retaining its own remuneration structure.
Herbert Smith runs an eight-year equity ladder from 43 to 100 points with a seven point increase year-on-year and an eight point increase in the final year, while Freehills operates a merit-based remuneration structure.
Clifford Chance, A&O, Norton Rose and DLA Piper have all also moved into the market since 2010 while China's King & Wood last year agreed a merger with Mallesons Stephen Jaques, another of Australia's leading law firms.
One Mallesons partner told Legal Week that his firm had also been approached last year by Linklaters regarding an exclusive alliance before the firm secured its deal with King & Wood. However, the Australian firm regarded the terms on offer by Linklaters as unattractive. The same partner suggested Linklaters' deal with AAR could see lawyers from the Australian firm's Asian offices joining Linklaters, with the rest of the firm retaining an exclusive alliance with Linklaters.
AAR, which has also been linked in other press reports to a tie-up with Mayer Brown, is understood to be reviewing its international strategy in the wake of the upheaval in its domestic market, with the firm considering whether to align itself with a foreign law firm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on the 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readLetter From Asia: Will Big Law Ever Bother to Understand Asia Again?
Simpson Thacher, Nishimura, Mori Hamada Assist on KKR's $4B Winning Bid in Japan
Trending Stories
- 1Stevens & Lee Names New Delaware Shareholder
- 2U.S. Supreme Court Denies Trump Effort to Halt Sentencing
- 3From CLO to President: Kevin Boon Takes the Helm at Mysten Labs
- 4How Law Schools Fared on California's July 2024 Bar Exam
- 5'Discordant Dots': Why Phila. Zantac Judge Rejected Bid for His Recusal
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250