Top Indian firms aim to modernise as bluechip consultants enter market
India's top law firms are turning to bluechip management consultancies such as McKinsey & Company in an effort to modernise their business models, as interest in the much-coveted legal market continues to grow. Boston Consulting Group recently concluded a strategic review of India's largest law firm, Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A Shroff & Co, which has seen it set out plans to double in size over the next five years to reach a lawyer headcount of around 1,000 and turnover of $203m (£129m).
March 01, 2012 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
India's elite bring in top consultancy firms for strategy overhaul
India's top law firms are turning to bluechip management consultancies such as McKinsey & Company in an effort to modernise their business models, as interest in the much-coveted legal market continues to grow.
Boston Consulting Group recently concluded a strategic review of India's largest law firm, Amarchand & Mangaldas & Suresh A Shroff & Co, which has seen it set out plans to double in size over the next five years to reach a lawyer headcount of around 1,000 and turnover of $203m (£129m).
Amarchand is also planning to launch its first overseas office, with sources indicating that London and Singapore are both under consideration.
The Boston-led review has also led to the Shroff founding family's stake in the firm being further cut back, a process that started in 1995. The firm's intention is to reduce the family's stake to between 40% and 50% by 2017.
Amarchand Mumbai managing partner Cyril Shroff (pictured) commented: "Our ambition is to be the largest and most professional law firm in India and this requires changes to our internal structures. The founding family will never exit the firm completely; there is a non-family component, but we will continue to be influential."
Meanwhile, Delhi's Luthra & Luthra has instructed McKinsey to advise it on bringing in a modified lockstep structure, a process which is set to be completed by the summer.
The high-profile consultancy is also helping Luthra to implement plans to double its lawyer numbers to 500 over a three-year period and to introduce up-to-date knowledge management systems.
Elsewhere, Trilegal is working with UK legal consultancy RSG, which has in recent years made significant inroads into the Indian legal market and works with a number of local law firms.
Trilegal, which has had an exclusive alliance with Allen & Overy since 2008, is consulting on whether to phase out its salaried partner rank.
Trilegal founding partner Sridhar Gorthi commented: "Hiring consultants is certainly a trend in India and a firm's choice of consultant is usually an indication of its motivation for doing so. Some firms want to demonstrate to the market that they are modernising by introducing transparent management systems."
The news comes amid a wider trend among Indian law firms to decentralise management, with several law firm founders and senior figures set to retire.
The Indian legal market has demonstrated robust year-on-year growth since economic liberalisation kicked off in the 1990s. RSG research indicates that the market is currently worth in the region of $800m (£502m), a figure which is set to pass $1bn (£627m) by 2015.
Despite international law firms remaining banned from opening local offices, it is estimated that half of the top 100 Indian companies' legal spend goes to foreign advisers.
The Madras high court recently confirmed that international law firms should not be prevented from visiting on a 'fly-in, fly-out' basis to advise clients on foreign law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on the 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readLetter From Asia: Will Big Law Ever Bother to Understand Asia Again?
Simpson Thacher, Nishimura, Mori Hamada Assist on KKR's $4B Winning Bid in Japan
Trending Stories
- 1Arnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
- 2Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
- 3Big Law’s Year—as Told in Commentaries
- 4Pa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
- 5Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250