Australia merger talks push Herbert Smith to mull lockstep revamp
Herbert Smith is set to overhaul its rigid lockstep structure, as merger talks with Australia's Freehills bring forward a consultation on whether the firm should introduce a more flexible system. The firm is expected to begin reviewing its lockstep in the coming weeks, with changes to be considered in light of its potential merger with Freehills, which operates a modified lockstep heavily linked to individual performance.
March 08, 2012 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
Freehills merger talks prompt firm to consider modified lockstep
Herbert Smith is set to overhaul its rigid lockstep structure, as merger talks with Australia's Freehills bring forward a consultation on whether the firm should introduce a more flexible system.
The firm is expected to begin reviewing its lockstep in the coming weeks, with changes to be considered in light of its potential merger with Freehills, which operates a modified lockstep heavily linked to individual performance.
No proposals have been discussed as the firm has yet to formally launch the review; however, partners suggest a number of issues could be considered both to better align the remuneration structure between the two firms and deal with longstanding criticism that pay for top earners has fallen behind key City rivals.
Changes set to be considered include lengthening the lockstep, increasing the difference between the top and bottom of the equity and introducing gateways to ensure performance criteria are met. Other options looked at in the past which could be reconsidered include a US-style tail-off at the top for older partners.
Herbert Smith originally pencilled in a review of its lockstep as part of the Project Blue Sky strategy review launched last spring, but never set a date for any discussions. The firm now plans to accelerate the process due to its talks with Freehills, which partners have suggested will result in a full financial merger but with each partnership likely to retain its own remuneration structure.
Herbert Smith currently operates a pure eight-year lockstep for equity partners running from 43 to 100 points, with partners moving up seven points in all but the final year, when they move up eight points. Profits per point stood at around £10,000 for 2010-11, with partners at the top making £1.007m against average profits per equity partner (PEP) of £892,000. This compares with average PEP at the magic circle of £1.27m.
As part of its efforts to tighten its hold on the equity, it is understood that Herbert Smith's management has informally extended the time partners spend in the salaried or 'B' partner rank from three years to four.
In contrast, Freehills' all-equity partnership is remunerated according to a heavily modified lockstep running from 40 to 120 points. Average PEP in last year's Am Law Global 100 stood at $970,000 (£617,000).
One ex-Herbert Smith partner said: "Herbert Smith always wanted to introduce some modifications to its partnership, but people feel the minute you tinker with the lockstep you're a step away from abolishing it. There are some strong views within the firm about it, but some factions would definitely welcome a change."
News of the impending review comes as Freehills and Herbert Smith move closer to a union, with some partners within the UK firm suggesting a vote is likely to take place within the next two months.
The tie-up could go live as early as July, with partners at Herbert Smith suggesting that a pure lockstep for the combined entity would be highly unlikely.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on the 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readLetter From Asia: Will Big Law Ever Bother to Understand Asia Again?
Simpson Thacher, Nishimura, Mori Hamada Assist on KKR's $4B Winning Bid in Japan
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250