Dundas set for new leadership as managing partner Shaw steps down
Dundas & Wilson managing partner Donald Shaw has resigned from his position, it was announced yesterday (7 March). The reasons for the move remain unclear, but a firm spokesperson confirmed that Shaw will remain with the firm and return to full-time client work.
March 08, 2012 at 06:41 AM
2 minute read
Dundas & Wilson managing partner Donald Shaw has resigned from his position, it was announced yesterday (7 March).
The reasons for his move are unclear, but a spokesperson confirmed that Shaw (pictured) will remain with the Scots leader and return to full-time client work.
The firm has appointed restructuring partner Caryn Penley and real estate partner Allan Wernham to take on Shaw's management responsibilities on an interim basis.
Firmwide chairman David Hardie has confirmed his intention to kick off an new election process for a new managing partner.
Hardie said: "We welcome Donald's decision to concentrate his considerable talent on our clients and to help us to further develop our firm and our strong focus on the real estate sector."
He added: "I will be arranging a managing partner election in due course. We are deeply grateful to Donald for his skilled and dedicated service to the firm over the last six years as managing partner."
The shake-up in leadership comes amid a challenging period for Scotland's leading law firms, which have been hit by the erosion of Glasgow and Edinburgh as professional service hubs but have also struggled to expand across the UK.
As a consequence, leading Scottish firms have made a number of UK merger attempts in recent years, with Dundas last year holding unsuccessful discussions with London practice Bircham Dyson Bell.
In February, McGrigors, one of Dundas' key rivals, agreed a takeover by Pinsent Masons, creating a national practice with revenues of around £280m.
Dundas also last month confirmed that it was set to make a handful of lawyer redundancies after a review of its business.
The 77-partner firm saw revenues rise by 1.6% to £62m in 2010-11, with average profits per equity partner up 2.5% to £325,000.
For more analysis, see Scottish firms – uncertain and unsettled, but what is next step?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpanish Firm Continues Geographical Diversification With Latest Partner Appointments
MoFo Replenishes Singapore Corporate Partner Loss as Lawyer Returns From Gibson Dunn
Trending Stories
- 1How Law Schools Fared on California's July 2024 Bar Exam
- 2'Discordant Dots': Why Phila. Zantac Judge Rejected Bid for His Recusal
- 3Here's What Corporate Litigators Expect Del. Courts to Address in 2025
- 4U.S. Supreme Court Has No Jurisdiction Over Trump's New York Criminal Case: Prosecutors
- 5The Law Firm Disrupted: With KPMG's Proposed Entry, Arizona's Liberalized Legal Market is Getting Interesting
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250