Linklaters and Allen & Gledhill end Singapore joint venture as A&O talks progress
Linklaters and Allen & Gledhill are to officially end their alliance as the Singapore firm continues its tie-up talks with magic circle rival Allen & Overy (A&O). The firms have reached a decision to formally terminate the joint venture, which has been in place since 2000, over the last few days, with one Linklaters' partner suggesting the venture will be wound down before the end of the financial year in April.
March 13, 2012 at 10:15 AM
3 minute read
Linklaters and Allen & Gledhill are to officially end their alliance as the Singapore firm continues its tie-up talks with magic circle rival Allen & Overy (A&O).
The firms have reached a decision to formally terminate the joint venture, which has been in place since 2000, over the last few days, with one Linklaters partner suggesting the venture will be wound down before the end of the financial year in April.
The decision comes as Allen & Gledhill, which with 312 lawyers is the second-largest law firm in Singapore by lawyer count, continues its discussions with A&O about a potential merger. The UK firm confirmed the talks in November last year.
The Singapore firm initially asked Linklaters about forming a closer relationship, but the firm declined due to a lack of demand for Singapore law advice from its international clients, opening the door to A&O.
Linklaters, which currently has about 40 lawyers including seven partners practising foreign law on the ground in Singapore, now plans to set up informal referral links with several local law firms over the coming months.
A&O and Allen & Gledhill are still working out details of their proposed union, which the firms are hoping could take the form of a merger but which could initially be structured as an alliance.
Last month Singapore announced plans to open up its legal market by allowing overseas firms to take stakes in local law practices and share profits, with overseas law firms able to take a profit and equity share in a Singapore firm of up to 33% in the event of a tie-up.
The Singapore Ministry of Law is currently considering an outline proposal by A&O and Allen & Gledhill detailing how the union could work.
News of the end of the Allen & Gledhill joint venture comes a month after Linklaters partners confirmed that the City firm is holding discussions with Australian leader Allens Arthur Robinson (AAR) about a strategic alliance.
The pair started discussions about a tie-up last year, with several partners stating that the firms were pursuing an alliance rather than a merger to avoid problems associated with the disparity in profitability between the UK and Australian firms.
AAR, which is an established referral partner of Slaughter and May, posted revenues of $459.5m (£291m) in 2010 with profit per equity partner (PEP) of $1.1m (£696,000), according to the most recent global 100. Linklaters' revenues for 2010-11 stood at £1.2bn alongside PEP of £1.225m.
Linklaters declined to comment.
For more analysis, see Crunch time for Singapore as Asia hub as A&O enters merger talks with local leader.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘The US Market Is Critical’: KPMG’s Former Head of Global Legal Services On the Big Four Firm’s Legal Arm Entering the US
6 minute readSingapore Litigators Shift Competitive Landscape as Another Senior Duo Sets Up Own Shop
Will a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to This Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Big Law Sidelined as Asian IPOs in New York Dominated by Small Cap Listings
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 2Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 3Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 4Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
- 5Zoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250