Linklaters replaces Olswang on News International civil litigation claims
Linklaters has taken over from Olswang advising News International on all outstanding civil litigation claims relating to the phone-hacking scandal at now-defunct Sunday tabloid The News of the World.
March 15, 2012 at 10:46 AM
2 minute read
Linklaters has taken over from Olswang to advise News International on all outstanding civil litigation claims relating to the phone-hacking scandal at now-defunct Sunday tabloid News of the World.
The UK top 40 firm has been taken off the case, with the switch in advisers coming after a number of civil cases settled in January, leading to a drop in advisory work.
Linklaters will now handle any outstanding litigation against the company on top of its existing role advising parent company News Corporation's management and standards committee.
The change in advisers, first reported in The Times yesterday (14 March), comes after Olswang was instructed by News International in July last year to draw up a new code of practice for the company when NoW scandal broke.
The firm was also taking the lead for News International and subsidiary News Group Newspapers on civil litigation claims, with around 20 cases settling in January including those of Jude Law, who was handed £130,000.
Around 11 law firms won roles on the proceedings, including Collyer Bristow, Mishcon de Reya, Bindmans and Atkins Thomson.
The news comes after Legal Week reported earlier this week that the Leveson Inquiry has spent more than half a million pounds of public funds on barristers' fees since the inquiry into media standards launched six months ago in light of the phone hacking scandal.
The bulk of the legal fees (£536,100) spent between July 2011 and 31 January 2012 have gone to the core counsel on the inquiry – 39 Essex Street's Robert Jay QC, Temple Garden Chambers' David Barr and Carine Patry Hoskins of Landmark Chambers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJenner & Block Expands London Team with Baker McKenzie Hire to Lead New Practice Area
2 minute readBennett Jones Securities Partner Alan Gardner Remembered as a Brilliant Lawyer & Mentor
3 minute readFreshfields Leads European M&A Rankings Again in 2024, as U.S. Firms Gain Market Share
5 minute readHSF Defends Bayer on Roundup Class Action as Litigation Comes to an End in Australia
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1California Lawmakers Reach $50M Deal to Fund Legal Fights Against Trump
- 2Supreme Court Wrestles With Disabled Ex-Firefighter's Discrimination Case
- 3NJ Firm Narrowly Avoids Case Dismissal Over Lengthy Complaint Filed in Fed Court
- 4Arbitrators Under Fire for Allegedly Forcing Workers to 'Stay or Pay' Employers
- 5Plaintiff Narrowly Avoids Dismissal Over Lengthy Complaint Filed in Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250