Ashurst's Australian tie-up includes option to split in event of US merger
Ashurst has the option of walking away from its deal with legacy Australian firm Blake Dawson if it agrees a tie-up with a US law firm before the planned merger with Blakes is approved, Legal Week has learned. Terms of the tie-up, finalised in September last year, specify that during the two-year period between Blakes rebranding as Ashurst at the start of this month and the proposed merger between the two firms going live in 2014, Ashurst has the option of abandoning the Australian deal in preference of a US tie-up.
March 22, 2012 at 08:03 PM
3 minute read
Ashurst has option to walk away from Blakes tie-up as firm names new managing partner
Ashurst has the option of walking away from its deal with legacy Australian firm Blake Dawson if it agrees a tie-up with a US law firm before the planned merger with Blakes is approved, Legal Week has learned.
Terms of the tie-up, finalised in September last year, specify that during the two-year period between Blakes rebranding as Ashurst at the start of this month and the proposed merger between the two firms going live in 2014, Ashurst has the option of abandoning the Australian deal in preference of a US tie-up.
Ashurst's partnership would simply have to vote against full financial integration in the second partnership vote on the merger, which is currently scheduled to take place in early 2014.
It is unclear what would happen to legacy Blakes, now operating as Ashurst Australia, in this instance, with some London partners speculating that it could revert to its former name or continue to operate as part of Ashurst but maintaining its own profit pool.
It is believed the union was structured in this manner as some Ashurst partners were concerned that a large domestic Australian offering could prejudice a US deal, which they believed to be more important to Ashurst.
Ashurst is known to have ambitions to secure a US merger, although it is not currently in any discussions, having previously held talks with Latham & Watkins and Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson in 2000 and 2003 respectively.
It is understood, however, that Ashurst is keen to secure any US tie-up with Blakes and that it has no plans to split from its new partner.
A former partner at the firm said: "There was a faction of partners within the firm that was firmly opposed to an Australian deal. As a result, [management] made sure that a deal with Blakes would not stand in the way of their ultimate goal to merge in the US."
An Ashurst partner commented: "An ideal situation would see us entering into a US deal that would include [the legacy Blake Dawson] but we need to be realistic – some of the top New York players would view a large domestic practice in Australia as a deal-breaker."
The news comes as Ashurst this week confirmed Paris-based banking partner James Collis as its new managing partner, following Simon Bromwich's decision to step down from the role to lead the litigation practice.
Collis, who will relocate to London to take up the role in the new financial year (1 May), has had a key role in shaping the firm's European banking strategy alongside banking chief Mark Vickers.
The firm has also created a new role for projects partner and longstanding board member Logan Mair, who will assume a position as client project and development partner.
Mair had been one of the individuals cited by partners as a likely candidate for the managing partner role.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on the 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readLetter From Asia: Will Big Law Ever Bother to Understand Asia Again?
Simpson Thacher, Nishimura, Mori Hamada Assist on KKR's $4B Winning Bid in Japan
Trending Stories
- 1Special Series Part 4: The Statutory Guardrails Impermissibly Bind Future Legislatures
- 2New York Court of Appeals Blocks Trump Attempt to Stay Friday Sentencing
- 3'Self-Diagnosed Nickel Allergy' Fails to Find Success in Med-Mal Suit, 8th Circuit Rules
- 4Eversheds Sutherland Adds Hunton Andrews Energy Lawyer With Cross-Border Experience
- 5Balancing Judicial Authority: Understanding Sanctions, Severance, and Interferences
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250