Top law firms redouble efforts to boost female representation
Herbert Smith, Hogan Lovells and Addleshaw Goddard are among a host of firms rolling out new initiatives to help retain and promote more female lawyers, with the moves coming as businesses face increasing pressure to up the number of women on boards.
March 22, 2012 at 08:03 PM
4 minute read
New initiatives at top 20 firms include flexi-working and mentoring
Herbert Smith, Hogan Lovells and Addleshaw Goddard are among a host of firms rolling out new initiatives to help retain and promote more female lawyers, with the moves coming as businesses face increasing pressure to up the number of women on boards.
Herbert Smith is planning to launch a new scheme to support the retention of female lawyers and increase the number of women in its partnership, with the five-point programme including unconscious bias training; flexible working initiatives; mentoring; career development and networking advice; and the expansion of its network for women in business to include its international offices.
The firm's head of diversity and inclusion, David Shields, is heading the committee leading the initiative, which will be announced internally in the coming weeks.
Meanwhile, Hogan Lovells is to target associates and of counsel with its current plans, which include mentoring programmes and pushing the firm's support for flexible working to those below partner level. The firm already has a global partner policy – put in place after its transatlantic merger – detailing flexible options for its partners. Simmons & Simmons is also reviewing its policies to help retain female lawyers and is planning to implement a mentoring scheme.
Elsewhere, Addleshaws, which plans to increase the number of women in its partnership from 20% to 25% by 2014, is launching a new five-part course next month for lawyers and in-house counsel covering issues such as leadership skills, networking and building strategic alliances.
Herbert Smith's Shields said: "We aim to address the problem of female attrition at associate level and find ways to encourage women to aim for partnership. We hope rolling out key programmes in this area will not only show female associates we are investing in them but result in some real change in the partnership."
Hogan Lovells litigation partner and diversity committee co-chair Ruth Grant (pictured) commented: "The challenges for law firms are greater [than in corporates] as people tend to stay in the partnership for much longer than the average director. Firms generally have many more partners than companies do board members, so it's potentially a slower process to boost the percentage of women overall."
Details of the firms' efforts come after Eversheds kicked off a four-pronged diversity programme in January covering internal role models, mentoring, a career forum for both sexes and improved maternity support. The firm also wants to increase the number of women in its partnership to 25% in the next two to three years, with litigation chief and head of gender diversity Ian Gray hoping to increase this figure to 30% in the next five years.
The retention of women in law has become a growing issue in recent years, with only a fraction of the women entering the profession eventually making partner. It comes as an annual study of boardroom gender by the Cranfield School of Management, published earlier this month, found women made up 15% of directors on top company boards, far below the 25% target set in a report published by Lord Davies last year.
Ashurst became the first leading UK law firm to introduce a target for the number of women it wants to employ in management positions when in October it detailed plans to have one quarter of its management posts filled by women within the next three years.
The target was introduced by the Ashurst Committee, which was created at the start of 2011 by senior partner Charlie Geffen and global head of corporate Stephen Lloyd with the intention of improving the retention of female lawyers.
Geffen said: "Firms need to reconcile the need to adapt to more flexible working with client demand for 24/7 service.Many clients are way ahead of law firms in this area and we need to catch up," he continued. "Getting people to change over 100 years of history is difficult, so the more public debate we have, the better."
However, Simmons senior partner Colin Passmore warned: "I don't accept the need to have X% of the partnership female within X number of years. Equality doesn't happen overnight, but if you put in place the right structure, culture and dynamics, everyone should be able to progress."
Additional reporting by Suzanna Ring.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUK Black History Month: Four A&O Shearman Staffers Honour Their Unsung Heroes
6 minute read'But We Exist': The Stigma Around Disability and Neurodivergence in Law Firms Persists
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250