A&O and Allen & Gledhill call off talks over Singapore tie-up
Allen & Overy (A&O) and Singapore leader Allen & Gledhill have called off discussions about a potential tie-up between the two firms. The firms announced that they are no longer in talks earlier this afternoon (26 March), with a spokesperson stating discussions had ended because they could not reach an agreement that was satisfactory to both parties.
March 26, 2012 at 10:48 AM
3 minute read
Allen & Overy (A&O) and Singapore leader Allen & Gledhill have called off discussions about a potential tie-up between the two firms.
The firms announced that they are no longer in talks earlier this afternoon (26 March), with a spokesperson stating discussions had ended because they could not reach an agreement that was satisfactory to both parties.
A&O confirmed it was in discussions with Linklaters' former joint venture partner about a potential merger or alliance in November last year, with Linklaters formally terminating its venture earlier this month.
A tie-up with 312-lawyer Allen & Gledhill, the second-largest Singapore law firm by headcount, would have been a powerful addition to A&O's existing Singapore practice, which comprises 60 lawyers, including eight partners. The firm practices both foreign and local law on the ground in Singapore, after becoming one of only six international firms to be awarded a Qualifying Foreign Law Practice (QFLP) license when these were rolled out in 2008.
A spokesperson for A&O said: "We have concluded our discussion with Allen & Gledhill on a proposal for an alliance or combination between the two firms. As a result both parties have agreed not to proceed. We have had an office in Singapore for almost 20 years which now has around 60 lawyers practising international as well as Singapore law. We continue to see that office and the South East Asia region as strategically significant".
The Singapore firm had initially asked Linklaters about forming a closer relationship, but the firm declined due to a lack of demand for Singapore law advice from its international clients, opening the door to A&O.
Linklaters, which currently has about 40 lawyers including seven partners practising foreign law on the ground in Singapore, now plans to set up informal referral links with several local law firms over the coming months.
News of the end of the discussions between A&O and Allen & Gledhill comes after the Singapore Ministry of Justice moved to open up the local legal market to allow overseas law firms to share profits with local firms. However, while allowing mergers to take place, foreign firms will not be able to hold an equity stake of more than 33%.
- For more analysis, see Crunch time for Singapore as Asia hub as A&O enters merger talks with local leader.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on the 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readLetter From Asia: Will Big Law Ever Bother to Understand Asia Again?
Simpson Thacher, Nishimura, Mori Hamada Assist on KKR's $4B Winning Bid in Japan
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250