New scheme to resolve family disputes via arbitration launches after decade of lobbying
Family disputes can now be resolved through arbitration, thanks to a new scheme launched this week that aims to help families deal with legal issues outside of the courts. The scheme, set up by the recently-formed Institute of Family Law Arbitrators (IFLA), will handle certain family law disputes relating to finance or property with arbitration for the first time, after years of lobbying from lawyers.
March 29, 2012 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
Family law disputes related to finance and property can now be resolved out of the court system
Family disputes can now be resolved through arbitration, thanks to a new scheme launched this week that aims to help families deal with legal issues outside of the courts.
The scheme, set up by the recently-formed Institute of Family Law Arbitrators (IFLA), will handle certain family law disputes relating to finance or property with arbitration for the first time, after years of lobbying from lawyers.
The new venture, which has been developed in association with the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, Family Law Bar Association and family lawyers' group Resolution, will allow claimants to appoint their own arbitrator from a panel of family lawyers trained as arbitrators under the scheme.
Claims that can now be dealt with using arbitration will include financial disputes arising from divorce, claims on inheritance from a child or spouse, claims for child maintenance, disputes about ownership of property between co-habiting couples and civil partnership financial claims.
The scheme was soft launched last month and formally went live on Monday (26 March).
Withers family partner Suzanne Kingston (pictured), who is on the panel of arbitrators, said: "Family lawyers have been lobbying for this move for around a decade now. Allowing people to resolve these issues through arbitration means that they can be resolved quickly, potentially more cheaply and confidentially, which is not only a benefit to those individuals involved, but helps alleviate the problem we have with the backlog of court cases building up in this country.
"This is also in keeping with other moves the Government has made in recent times concerning mediation, as we look to help people resolve their disputes outside court."
The news comes as part of a push by the Government and the legal profession to encourage disputes to be resolved outside the courts, amid wider cost-cutting efforts.
Divorcing couples are now required to attend a mediation awareness session before going to court under protocols outlined by the Ministry of Justice that came into effect from April 2011, in an effort to remove the backlog of cases and reduce court costs.
Mills & Reeve family partner Roger Bamber said: "This has come at a time when clients are turning to other ways of resolving disputes and is in line with the rise in mediation and collaborative law. The recession has seen a sea change, and arbitration will make a greater impact as a result.
"I do not think arbitration will be extended beyond financial and property issues for the time being, though there may be developments into mediation/arbitration at some point in the future, as is the case in Canada."
The launch of the new service comes after Mishcon de Reya teamed up with etiquette experts Debrett's earlier this year to produce a guide to separation and divorce covering behavioural aspects as well as the legal process in an effort to "promote civility upon separation".
Family disputes that can now be arbitrated
- Financial disputes arising from divorce
- Claims on inheritance from a child or spouse
- Financial claims made in England and Wales after a divorce abroad
- Claims for child maintenance between unmarried parents
- Property ownership disputes between co-habiting couples
- Civil partnership financial claims
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Kingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Jones Day Expands European Footprint with Global Disputes Partner in Madrid
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250