Pegasus – slaying the Bar's beast of a diversity problem
"Mini-pupillages are essential for getting a pupillage in the end and most sets would not look at a candidate without them," says Brick Court Chambers co-head Jonathan Hirst QC. Following last year's creation of PRIME by a group of leading law firms the Bar in March announced its own bid to increase socio-economic diversity with the 'Pegasus Access Scheme'. The initiative is not a direct counter-point to PRIME as it is focused on forging a direct path to pupillage for under-graduates rather than raising aspiration by introducing relatively under-privileged school children to the legal profession.
April 05, 2012 at 04:55 AM
6 minute read
"Mini-pupillages are essential for getting a pupillage in the end and most sets would not look at a candidate without them," says Brick Court Chambers co-head Jonathan Hirst QC (pictured).
Following last year's creation of PRIME by a group of leading law firms the Bar in March announced its own bid to increase socio-economic diversity with the 'Pegasus Access Scheme'. The initiative is not a direct counter-point to PRIME as it is focused on forging a direct path to pupillage for under-graduates rather than raising aspiration by introducing relatively under-privileged school children to the legal profession.
Launched by the Inner Temple, the new scheme has seen 44 chambers commit to taking on a number of university students from disadvantaged backgrounds for mini-pupillages. These comprise work experience of between two and five days, travel and meal expenses included. A further seven chambers are set to sign-up imminently.
The scheme aims to address the barriers-to-entry that exist for those from less fortunate backgrounds trying to have a career at the Bar but failing to gain the relevant experience required for a pupillage.
Diversity statistics have notoriously been lacking from the Bar to date, however the Bar Standards Board compiled its first break-down report last year – known as the Bar Barometer – showing 24% of those taking pupillage in 2009-10 were from Oxford or Cambridge universities.
Of those pupils who declared that they had accumulated debts at university, almost 50% of pupils had debts of £10,000 or more and over 6% had debts in excess of £40,000.
The report also found that 52% of pupils in 2009-10 had attended state school compared with 35% from fee-paying schools and 13% who did not disclose.
Inner Temple sub-treasurer chief executive Patrick Maddams comments: "For candidates from less advantaged socio-economic backgrounds, we found that one of the main barriers was work experience. Mini-pupillages are crucial for scholarship interviews and subsequent pupillage applications, so we have tried to recognise this."
Fountain Court's Patricia Robertson QC (pictured) comments: "Financial and socio-economic circumstances remain some of the most prevalent barriers to entry to a career at the Bar. In the past, people would perhaps view the Bar as a closed society of people whose parents had been lawyers or barristers, so they would enjoy a leg-up. I hope that has long ceased to be true now.
"The aim of schemes like this is to help those who might otherwise struggle financially to come to the Bar and to make sure that everyone can have access through the front door, no matter what their background."
While the Bar has already embarked on a number of schemes to try and improve access to the profession to date, these have largely centred on initiatives such as Pathways to Law and The Inner Temple Schools Project that focus on school children in the 14-18-year range.
The Pegasus Access Scheme will target second and third year university students, with some sets taking on first year students as well, with a specific aim to carry through the existing school initiatives to university level.
Candidates that have already been involved in one of the school schemes will be prioritised. However, Maddams emphasises that all applicants will be seriously considered for the programme.
He says: "We will look at applications holistically, with first priority given to those candidates that have come through from our schools scheme, however we will consider all applicants meeting certain academic criteria from under-represented backgrounds.
"We also want to prepare candidates as comprehensively as possible so that they can get the most out of the mini-pupillage experience, and will give them an induction session before they join the set."
The deadline for the first set of student applications falls this month when around 70 placements are likely to be offered, with around 100 placements expected in the full round in September. The placements will take place throughout the year.
According to top sets, current pupillage applicants are expected to have carried out a number of mini-pupillages – often around five – to be considered seriously with a range of sets considered favourable.
Hirst says: "It is of the utmost importance that anyone who is of the academic calibre to go to the Bar but does not have access to these schemes for socio-economic reasons, be recognised and aided. This does not mean changing the criteria or lowering the standards at all.
"We make it very clear that candidates will require at least a 2:1 degree grade, and really a high 2:1, to get a pupillage, but if the problem comes down to not having managed to gain access to the practical experience required this is definitely something that should, can and will be changed through schemes like Pegasus."
However, the extent to which Pegasus can make a serious dent in diversity at the Bar remains debatable. Current pressure on the publicly funded Bar and the gradual expansion of the amount of advocacy work taken on by solicitors has led to a much-publicised mis-match between the large numbers seeking pupillages and the 500-odd places on offer every year. With vocational law schools currently producing well over 1,000 BPTC graduates annually it remains far harder to secure a place at the Bar than it is to gain a solicitors training contract.
A series of reports on widening access to the Bar – there have been six since 1991 – have struggled to make much headway in dealing with the basic issue of boosting diversity in a sector with limited number of places and a huge supply of highly-qualified candidates. A best case scenario is that Pegasus will be one of a number of initiatives to carve out modest but valuable progress.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250