Law Society criticises trainee minimum salary proposals
The Law Society has branded the recent trainee minimum salary review by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) as "unfortunate" and "premature", as trainees face seeing their pay fall to as little as £2.60 per hour. The society's response comes after the SRA launched a consultation on the minimum salary for trainees in January this year, after claiming there was no clear evidence that setting a minimum salary fulfils any of the regulatory objectives of the Legal Services Act, which came into force last year.
April 13, 2012 at 07:01 AM
2 minute read
The Law Society has branded the recent trainee minimum salary review by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) as "unfortunate" and "premature", as trainees face seeing their pay fall to as little as £2.60 per hour.
The society's response comes after the SRA launched a consultation on the minimum salary for trainees in January this year, after claiming there was no clear evidence that setting a minimum salary fulfils any of the regulatory objectives of the Legal Services Act, which came into force last year.
However, the Law Society has criticised the proposals in light of the ongoing Legal Education and Training Review (LETR), while stressing its support for the minimum salary as a "safeguard" against trainee exploitation.
It said: "In the Law Society's view, it is unfortunate that the SRA has chosen to consult on this issue at this time. Consideration of this issue is premature in the light of the ongoing LETR.
"It cannot be possible to make a considered decision on this important and emotive matter when, as both the SRA and the Legal Services Board have indicated, there is the potential for such radical change in the future landscape of education and training for solicitors in England and Wales. The regulation of the minimum salary for trainee solicitors should not, in our view, be dealt with as a discrete issue."
The current minimum salary levels are £18,590 in central London and £16,650 outside, with the rates frozen in the past two years to reflect the economic downturn. In contrast, the national minimum wage is set at £6.08 per hour for those aged 21 and over.
However, the deregulation of the minimum salary could see traineeships classed as apprenticeships, which would mean employers are only liable to pay the national minimum wage as set out in 1999.
These regulations would apply a rate of £2.60 per hour for apprentices in their first year, and £6.08 per hour (the standard minimum wage) for subsequent years.
The results of the SRA's consultation will be fed back to the SRA board at its May meeting.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Subsidiaries in Belgium and France Sued by DRC Over Conflict Minerals
2 minute readDLA Piper, Heuking & Other Key Moves as German Legal Market Reshuffles Ahead of 2025
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250