Ex-Dentons India head struck off and handed £600k bill after bribery case
SNR Denton has won a claim against former India group head Gauri Advani to reimburse the firm for costs it incurred as co-defendant in her 2009 bribery case. Advani, who was struck off as a solicitor by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal earlier this month (3 April), has been ordered to pay a legal bill of almost £600,000 on behalf of legacy Denton Wilde Sapte and its insurer Travelers.
April 16, 2012 at 07:27 AM
3 minute read
SNR Denton has won a claim against former India group head Gauri Advani to reimburse the firm for costs it incurred as co-defendant in her 2009 bribery case.
Advani, who was struck off as a solicitor by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal earlier this month (3 April), has been ordered to pay a legal bill of almost £600,000 on behalf of legacy Denton Wilde Sapte and its insurer Travelers.
The ruling comes after Dentons and Travelers sued Advani in 2010 to reclaim the defence costs from a 2009 case brought by two former clients of Advani's in which she was alleged to have committed bribery.
Travelers covered all legal fees for the case, but claimed the money back on the basis that the insurance policy was invalid if a court found that the holder guilty of dishonest or fraudulent activity. Meanwhile, Dentons claimed that Advani had acted outside of the contract of her employment with the firm.
In its ruling, the High Court supported the claims of both the law firm and the insurer, entitling Travelers to a sum of £501,399 and Dentons £87,075, on the basis that Advani had contractually agreed to act honestly while associated with Dentons.
An SNR Denton spokesperson said: "The High Court has ruled in favour of SNR Denton and its insurers to recover their costs from Ms Gauri Advani, a former employee of the firm. The Court held that Ms Advani had acted dishonestly and outside the course of her employment in relation to events in 2002 that were the subject of earlier proceedings, brought unsuccessfully by third parties against the firm."
Clyde & Co represented Travelers and Dentons on the claim, instructing 4 New Square's Justin Fenwick QC and Clare Dixon. Meanwhile, Michael Collard of 5 Pump Court represented Advani, instructed by Essex law firm Akal Solicitors. Withers had initially defended Advani with a team led by litigation head Christopher Coffin.
The 2009 case saw two Indian travel agents sue Dentons and Advani after allegedly being advised by her to pay a £400,000 'deposit' to gain an exclusive UK travel deal arrangement for Air India, which never materialised after the sum was paid.
The claimants instructed Blake Lapthorn in that case, while Barlow Lyde & Gilbert represented Dentons and Kennedys acted for Advani, who did not give evidence. A judge ruled the case illegal after deciding that the claimants understood that the money could have only been a bribe rather than a deposit; however, the High Court found this irrelevant in light of Dentons' claim against Advani.
Advani was head of India at Eversheds at the time of the 2009 court case after joining from Dentons in 2007. She left Eversheds in May 2010.
Click here to read the full High Court ruling.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Beijing Chief Representative Leaves for New York Boutique Sterlington
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Axiom-Ince: SFO Charges Five, Including Former Head, Following Investigation
3 minute readSDT Upholds SLAPP Claim Against Osborne Clarke Partner Advising Nadhim Zahawi
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250