Irwin Mitchell chair among senior working party advising on contingency fees reform
A working party led by Irwin Mitchell chairman Michael Napier QC has been launched by the Civil Justice Council (CJC) to explore issues surrounding changes to contingency fees set to come into play next year. The 11-member panel, which met for the first time yesterday (17 April), has been asked to consider the conflicting interests regarding damage-based agreements (DBAs) and make any recommendations over regulations that should be introduced.
April 19, 2012 at 09:05 AM
2 minute read
A working party led by Irwin Mitchell chairman Michael Napier QC has been launched by the Civil Justice Council (CJC) to explore issues surrounding changes to contingency fees set to come into play next year.
The 11-member panel, which met for the first time yesterday (17 April), has been asked to consider the conflicting interests regarding damage-based agreements (DBAs) and make any recommendations over regulations that should be introduced.
DBAs, part of the Jackson reforms of civil litigation costs, are a form of contingency fee that will allow lawyers to claim a portion of the claimant's damages as a success fee in contentious cases.
The working party also includes 4 New Square's Nicholas Bacon QC, McGuireWoods partner Hardeep Nahal, Solicitors Regulation Authority executive director Richard Collins, Keoghs strategy director Don Clarke, Peter Douglas of the Bar Standards Board and Edwin Coe senior partner David Greene.
The group is also set to consider issues including: whether a lawyer acting under a DBA should be liable for adverse costs; the possibility of partial DBAs; and whether there should be an obligation to notify opposing parties if lawyers have entered into a DBA.
The panel is due to report its findings to the CJC by the end of July this year before they are then presented to the Ministry of Justice.
The move comes ahead of the introduction of the Jackson reforms contained within the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill in April 2013, which will see the abolition of the recoverability of success fees and associated costs in 'no win, no fee' conditional fee arrangements, with claimants to pay their lawyers' success fees instead.
Click here for the latest 4 New Square briefings on Legal Week Law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Subsidiaries in Belgium and France Sued by DRC Over Conflict Minerals
2 minute readDLA Piper, Heuking & Other Key Moves as German Legal Market Reshuffles Ahead of 2025
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250