Murdoch Leveson evidence reveals SRA referral for Times lawyer
News International (NI) has referred an in-house lawyer at The Times to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) in relation to their role on the 'Nightjack' email hacking case. The news emerged today (25 April) in News Corporation chief Rupert Murdoch's witness statement to the Leveson Inquiry into media standards.
April 25, 2012 at 10:52 AM
2 minute read
News International (NI) has referred an in-house lawyer at The Times to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) in relation to their role on the 'Nightjack' email hacking case.
The news emerged today (25 April) in News Corporation chief Rupert Murdoch's witness statement to the Leveson Inquiry into media standards.
Murdoch's statement gives reference to the 2009 Nightjack case, which saw anonymous police blogger Richard Horton attempt to obtain a High Court injunction to prevent a reporter at The Times identifying him in the newspaper.
Mr Justice Eady ruled in favour of The Times, allowing the newspaper to reveal Horton's identity; however, it later emerged that the reporter in question, Patrick Foster, had uncovered Horton's identity through email hacking.
Murdoch's statement says: "I understand that NI has referred the in-house lawyer involved to the SRA and that NI has reviewed and issued guidance to all in-house lawyers following this matter."
The Times' former legal manager Alastair Brett came under scrutiny at Leveson last month after he conceded that the statements submitted to the High Court in the 2009 case were "not entirely accurate" and that he was trying to prevent a criminal prosecution being brought against Foster.
He told Lord Justice Leveson that statements presented to the court in the case "did not give the full story".
Horton is now suing The Times and has instructed Taylor Hampton's Mark Lewis to act for him, with Linklaters representing the newspaper.
NI and the SRA declined to comment.
Click here to read Murdoch's full witness statement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBroadcom Hires From Nuclear Giant to Appoint French Legal Head
GCs Say They are Getting 'Edged Out' of UK Boardrooms
'I Won’t Name the Firm, But...'—Barratt Redrow's Legal Head on External Counsel Red Flags
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250