Murdoch Leveson evidence prompts war of words with former in-house lawyer
News Corporation chief Rupert Murdoch has further criticised former legal adviser Harbottle & Lewis in his testimony to the Leveson Inquiry, which also saw him lay blame on former News of the World legal manager Tom Crone for his role in an alleged phone-hacking 'cover-up'...
April 26, 2012 at 12:37 PM
4 minute read
News Corporation chief Rupert Murdoch has further criticised former legal adviser Harbottle & Lewis in his testimony to the Leveson Inquiry, which also saw him lay blame on former News of the World legal manager Tom Crone for his role in an alleged phone-hacking 'cover-up'.
In reference to Harbottle's role advising the company during a 2007 investigation into phone-hacking at News International, Murdoch said today (26 April) that he could not understand a law firm reading the emails they were given and "not ringing the chief executive of a company and saying, 'Hey, you've got some big problems'."
His criticism came after he gave an interview to The Wall Street Journal last July in which he said Harbottle had made "a major mistake" in its part in the investigation.
During the questioning by Lord Justice Leveson and Robert Jay QC today, Murdoch claimed that he and other senior executives had been shielded from what was really going on at the News of the World, laying blame for a cover-up on his editors and lawyers.
While he did not directly name Crone it was apparent he was referring to him and at one point he suggested the company had made a mistake by allowing Crone to serve for so long, stating: "I think we should not have allowed – not have had one legal officer at the News of the World for 20 years. I think those sort of people should be changed every five or, at the worst, every 10 years."
In response, Crone later put out a statement saying: "Since Rupert Murdoch's evidence today about a lawyer who had been on the News of the World for many years can only refer to me, I am issuing the following statement.
"His assertion that I 'took charge of a cover-up' in relation to phone-hacking is a shameful lie. The same applies to his assertions that I misinformed senior executives about what was going on and that I forbade people from reporting to Rebekah Brooks or to James Murdoch.
"It is perhaps no coincidence that the two people he has identified in relation to his cover-up allegations are the same two people who pointed out that his son's evidence to the Parliamentary Select Committee last year was inaccurate."
The testimony also saw Murdoch state News Corporation had spent hundreds of millions of dollars on the hacking scandal, examining 300 million emails during its internal investigations, with Linklaters reviewing two million of these on behalf of News Corp.
The session also saw Murdoch questioned about why News International had not waived client privilege for criminal law firm BCL Burton Copeland, which was "heavily involved" in the phone-hacking investigation in 2007 alongside Harbottle. BCL's report has not been seen and the firm has not been able to provide testimony to the inquiry due to client privilege.
Additionally Murdoch said he was "shocked" by The Times' former legal manager Alastair Brett "not telling (Mr Justice Eady) the truth of a lot of things".
Brett came under scrutiny at Leveson last month after he conceded that statements submitted to the High Court in 2009 regarding the 'Nightjack' case – which saw anonymous police blogger Richard Horton attempt to obtain a High Court injunction to prevent a reporter at The Times identifying him – were "not entirely accurate", after it emerged that the reporter in question, Patrick Foster, had uncovered Horton's identity through email hacking.
Click here for the transcript of Murdoch's Leveson statement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBroadcom Hires From Nuclear Giant to Appoint French Legal Head
GCs Say They are Getting 'Edged Out' of UK Boardrooms
'I Won’t Name the Firm, But...'—Barratt Redrow's Legal Head on External Counsel Red Flags
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250