Ex-News International legal chief criticised as hacking report backs Harbottle probe role
A parliamentary committee has exonerated former News International (NI) law firm Harbottle & Lewis of blame for its role in a 2007 investigation into phone-hacking, with former NI legal manager Tom Crone criticised for allegedly misleading the committee. Crone has since stated that he does "not accept that he gave misleading evidence", and that he is "the subject of serious allegations which lack foundation".
May 01, 2012 at 12:54 PM
4 minute read
A parliamentary committee has exonerated former News International (NI) law firm Harbottle & Lewis of blame for its role in a 2007 investigation into phone-hacking, as former NI legal manager Tom Crone faces renewed criticism for allegedly misleading the committee.
The report, issued today (1 May) by the Culture, Media and Sport committee, contains support for Harbottle's role in the investigation into phone-hacking at NI five years ago.
The London firm has come under scrutiny in recent months after News Corporation chief Rupert Murdoch last year accused the firm of making "a major mistake" in its review of a cache of NI emails in 2007.
However, the committee supported Harbottle's position, with the report stating that the firm was correct in its assertion that "there was absolutely no question of the firm being asked to provide NI with a clean bill of health which it could deploy years later in wholly different contexts for wholly different purposes".
The report states that the firm's former managing partner Lawrence Abramson, who led the review, was "simply doing his job as a lawyer".
The report continues: "The fact that [former NI director of legal affairs] Jonathan Chapman drew up such narrow terms for the Harbottle & Lewis review strongly suggests that he was deliberately turning a blind eye to emails that he did not want to investigate further.
"In keeping his conclusions about the emails strictly within the narrow scope of his investigation, Lawrence Abramson was undoubtedly simply doing his job as a lawyer. Indeed, he seems to have made some effort to alert News International to problems that he uncovered."
The report also criticises Crone for misleading the committee over his knowledge of the details surrounding the phone-hacking settlement paid to Professional Footballers' Association chief executive Gordon Taylor in 2008, in particular, the 'for Neville' email – which contained transcripts of voicemail correspondence with Taylor and his personal assistant – and a legal opinion from Michael Silverleaf QC of 11 South Square.
It states: "We know now that Tom Crone had also had sight of counsel's opinion from Michael Silverleaf QC which referred to 'a powerful case that there is (or was) a culture of illegal information access used at NGN in order to produce stories for publication'."
"Yet in giving evidence to the Committee both Tom Crone and [former News of the World editor] Colin Myler attempted to downplay the significance of the 'for Neville' email and made no mention of the legal opinion that they had obtained. In itself this amounts to an attempt to mislead the Committee."
The report also states that Crone's assurances to the committee that there was no evidence that News of the World employees other than former royal editor Clive Goodman had been involved in phone-hacking were "not true", stating: "Both Tom Crone and Colin Myler deliberately avoided disclosing crucial information to the Committee and, when asked to do, answered questions falsely."
Crone has since stated that he does "not accept that he gave misleading evidence", and that he is "the subject of serious allegations which lack foundation". (click here for Crone's full statement).
The news comes after Murdoch further criticised Harbottle in his testimony to the Leveson Inquiry last week, which also saw him lay blame on Crone for his role in an alleged phone-hacking 'cover-up'.
The session also saw Murdoch questioned about why NI had not waived client privilege for criminal law firm BCL Burton Copeland, which was "heavily involved" in the 2007 phone-hacking investigation alongside Harbottle. BCL's report has not been seen and the firm has not been able to provide testimony to the inquiry due to client privilege.
The committee adds in today's report: "We call on the company to waive legal privilege, so that the Burton Copeland advice and investigations can be published and submitted to the Leveson Inquiry."
- Click here for the full Culture, Media and Sport committee report
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBroadcom Hires From Nuclear Giant to Appoint French Legal Head
GCs Say They are Getting 'Edged Out' of UK Boardrooms
'I Won’t Name the Firm, But...'—Barratt Redrow's Legal Head on External Counsel Red Flags
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250