Corporate counsel are key in assessing risk as regulatory action becomes more common
Eversheds Consulting's Lee O'Connell explains how the general counsel role has evolved to take on compliance issues
May 03, 2012 at 07:03 PM
5 minute read
Eversheds Consulting's Lee O'Connell explains how the GC role has evolved to take on compliance issues
In today's global and economic environments, regulatory compliance is seen by corporate counsel as one of their highest legal risk areas and, with regulator action on the increase, it is now presenting legal departments across the globe with many different challenges.
One key area of focus is the need for organisations to develop and embed fully functioning risk and compliance frameworks, servicing many internal departments, including legal, across multiple international jurisdictions and in accordance with differing regulatory regimes. The impact of these regulatory compliance changes on the entire enterprise need to be considered in unison with those once thought of as purely legal risk, widening the scope of those involved in establishing the risks.
Responsibility is now falling to corporate counsel to play a pivotal role in identifying and driving targeted legal risk and compliance programmes across multiple jurisdictions that incorporate good ethical, legal and risk management behaviours.
The steps
As corporate counsel are now required to incorporate effective risk management methods within their processes in order to circumvent long and costly litigation, they need to become involved with:
- the early identification of regulatory compliance, as well as ethical and legal risk issues;
- fully contributing to the risk management process;
- improving understanding of the enterprise-wide impact of compliance across multiple jurisdictions and knowledge transfer;
- communicating and helping to train legal compliance; and
- settling regulatory disputes by increased negotiation based on risk-informed outcomes.
Incorporating the above into normal routines and improving the approach to risk and compliance processes within any global organisation can bring benefits to the whole company and help with employee engagement.
Early identification
The early identification of regulatory compliance and ethical and legal risk issues across multiple jurisdictions is crucial for the success of implementing a global risk and compliance model.
Risk information used to formulate the risk strategy can be obtained via many sources including corporate counsel knowledge transfer and previous dispute experience, regulatory compliance early warning systems, compliance control functions and control risk self assessment.
Relevant, regular and up-to-date information on regulation specific to the sector needs to be readily available to those contributing to the compliance and risk frameworks, and legal teams can play a vital role in disseminating pertinent regulatory information.
Risk management
Corporate counsel need to understand their enterprise-wide legal and regulatory risks, enabling them to contribute to the risk strategy of the business. A well-established system for facilitating this would be an integrated global compliance and risk framework that can be used and updated by all functional departments.
This would highlight the importance of enterprise-wide risk management across a whole organisation and provide risk information on a global perspective that may be applicable to any functional group.
It would allow for accurate multijurisdictional risk assessment and could be used to track, manage and monitor risks across many multiple jurisdictions. What can often be perceived as a small risk in one particular area, when connected with another, could have a greater impact upon the organisation.
Deeper understanding
The role of in-house corporate counsel has to continually evolve, with responsibilities being further expanded to include providing advice and guidance on regulatory compliance and ethical issues, and inclusion in the development and implementation of risk management programmes.
There will be a need for a deeper understanding of the enterprise-wide impact of compliance across multiple jurisdictions through improved knowledge transfer and centralised information and data sources.
Focused communications
Following early identification of regulatory requirements, the role of corporate counsel becomes vital in providing relevant, effective and regular communications and training of regulatory changes, either independently or incorporated within firmwide releases or training programmes.
It enables the embedding of a risk and compliance-aware culture specifically focused on the right areas to improve business performance.
Regulatory disputes
When armed with the above steps, corporate counsel equip the organisation, the employees and themselves with legal, regulatory, compliance and risk information and fully become part of the value chain. This enables the early settling of regulatory disputes through an enterprise-wide approach and allows for more increased negotiation on disputes based on the risk and legal informed outcomes of the organisation.
In summary
There is a growing consensus and recent research is verifying that corporate counsel are becoming more pro-active in their approach to compliance by becoming involved with and incorporating risk management tools and techniques on a global scale in order to circumvent long and costly litigation.
Corporate counsel can play a key role in driving these targeted compliance and risk programmes across multiple jurisdictions that incorporate good ethical and risk management behaviours.
This, coupled with focused risk training and 'top-down' communications, will help contribute to a fully operational enterprise-wide system of legal, risk and compliance.
Lee O'Connell (pictured) is a senior management consultant in the risk and compliance group at Eversheds Consulting.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250