High Court judge faces OJC investigation after pro-marriage charity launch
High Court judge Sir Paul Coleridge has come under scrutiny over comments made at the launch of his new pro-marriage charity, with the Office for Judicial Complaints (OJC) handed an official complaint on the matter. Coleridge launched the Marriage Foundation on 1 May this year in an effort to "increase the rate of marriage and reduce the rate of divorce".
May 16, 2012 at 05:44 AM
2 minute read
High Court judge Sir Paul Coleridge has come under scrutiny over comments made at the launch of his new pro-marriage charity, with the Office for Judicial Complaints (OJC) handed an official complaint on the matter.
Coleridge launched the Marriage Foundation on 1 May this year in an effort to "increase the rate of marriage and reduce the rate of divorce". Its patrons include high-profile names such as Baroness Ruth Deech and Baroness Fiona Shackleton.
The charity states on its website that its primary aim is "to champion long-lasting, stable relationships within marriage," adding: "There are other organisations which support couple relationships of all types; valuable work but not our mission."
At the opening of the charity earlier this month, Coleridge said: "This is not going to be a cosy club for the smug and self-satisfied of middle England but, we hope, the start of a national movement with the aim of changing attitudes across the board from the very top to the bottom of society, and thus improve the lives of us all, especially children."
In a statement, the OJC said: "The Office for Judicial Complaints has received a complaint in relation to comments that Sir Paul Coleridge is reported to have made.
"That complaint will be considered under the judicial discipline regulations in the usual way. It would not be appropriate to comment further at this stage."
The news comes after the Law Society called off a conference – at which Coleridge was a key speaker – which was set to debate gay marriage at its headquarters this month, due to a conflict with the Society's "role in promoting diversity."
The event, set up by US organisation World Congress of Families in partnership with UK lobbying group Christian Concern, was due to be held at the Law Society's London base next Wednesday (23 May)
However, the Society cancelled the event – titled "One man. One woman. Making the case for marriage, for the good of society"- in light of the topics up for discussion.
Coleridge was appointed as a High Court judge in 2000 after 30 years as a family barrister.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSpanish Firm Continues Geographical Diversification With Latest Partner Appointments
MoFo Replenishes Singapore Corporate Partner Loss as Lawyer Returns From Gibson Dunn
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250