Field Fisher and LG hold merger discussions over £150m tie-up
Field Fisher Waterhouse has confirmed it is in merger talks with LG, in a move which could create a law firm with revenues of more than £150m, placing it just outside the UK top 20. The merger talks are at a very early stage, with no proposals yet put to partners at either firm. A spokesperson for Field Fisher confirmed: "Like the majority of mid-market firms, a merger is on our agenda. Field Fisher has ambitious growth plans and we recognise that a merger is a way to achieve those goals." She continued: "We would like to grow our offices in Europe, to strengthen our core practice areas and to offer clients greater international reach. As such we have been in talks with several firms, including LG, and have been exploring the benefits that such a merger would bring." Field Fisher has 153 partners and more than 220 lawyers across seven European offices. The firm posted a 2.2% increase fee income to reach £94m for the 2010-11 financial year, while profits per equity partner (PEP) rose 7% to £510,000. LG, meanwhile, has 73 partners and 196 lawyers. The mid-market firm saw both revenue and profits fall significantly at the close of last year, with turnover for 2010-11 coming in at £59m, 9% down on the £64.9m posted the previous year, a result which saw the firm drop out of the UK top 50. PEP, meanwhile, fell 10% to £412,000 from £460,000. A tie-up with LG would gift Field Fisher new offices in Monaco, Dubai and Moscow, while LG would benefit from Field Fisher's presence in Brussels, Dusseldorf, Hamburg, Manchester, Munich and Paris. LG has been openly looking for a merger in recent years, with the firm entering into serious discussions with Scotland's Shepherd and Wedderburn last summer, which are understood to have ended around September 2011 after the Scottish firm opted out of the talks.
May 18, 2012 at 06:45 AM
2 minute read
Field Fisher Waterhouse has confirmed it is in merger talks with LG, in a move which could create a law firm with revenues of more than £150m, placing it just outside the UK top 20.
The merger talks, news of which was first reported on RollonFriday today (18 May), are at a very early stage, with no proposals yet put to partners at either firm.
A spokesperson for Field Fisher confirmed: "Like the majority of mid-market firms, a merger is on our agenda. Field Fisher has ambitious growth plans and we recognise that a merger is a way to achieve those goals."
She continued: "We would like to grow our offices in Europe, to strengthen our core practice areas and to offer clients greater international reach. As such we have been in talks with several firms, including LG, and have been exploring the benefits that such a merger would bring."
LG managing partner Hugh Maule said: "I can confirm that LG and Field Fisher Waterhouse are evaluating a merger. This would meet our strategic objectives in terms of international expansion and strengthening of our core practice groups and sectors. There would be significant benefits for our clients with few or no conflicts."
Field Fisher has 153 partners and more than 220 lawyers across seven European offices. The firm posted a 2.2% increase fee income to reach £94m for the 2010-11 financial year, while profits per equity partner (PEP) rose 7% to £510,000.
LG, meanwhile, has 73 partners and 196 lawyers. The mid-market firm saw both revenue and profits fall significantly at the close of last year, with turnover for 2010-11 coming in at £59m, 9% down on the £64.9m posted the previous year, a result which saw the firm drop out of the UK top 50. PEP, meanwhile, fell 10% to £412,000 from £460,000.
A tie-up with LG would gift Field Fisher new offices in Monaco, Dubai and Moscow, while LG would benefit from Field Fisher's presence in Brussels, Dusseldorf, Hamburg, Manchester, Munich and Paris.
LG has been openly looking for a merger in recent years, with the firm entering into serious discussions with Scotland's Shepherd and Wedderburn last summer, which are understood to have ended around September 2011.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Kim & Chang, Freshfields, A&O Shearman Take Top Spots for Highest Collective Deal Value as APAC M&A Grew By Just 1% in 2024
Blocking of $14B Nippon US Steel Deal Will Not Dampen Japan-U.S. M&A, Lawyers Say
Latham, Paul Weiss, Debevoise Land on Year-End Big Deals. But Geopolitical Uncertainty Could Slow M&A Growth in 2025
11 minute readTrending Stories
- 1TikTok Law and TikTok Politics
- 2California Supreme Court Vacates Murder Conviction in Infant Abuse Case
- 3New York’s Proposed Legislation Restraining Transfer of Real Property
- 4Withers Hires Lawyers, Staff From LA Trusts and Estates Boutique
- 5To Speed Criminal Discovery, NY Bill Proposes Police-to-Prosecutor Pipeline For Records
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
