Brazilian Bar debates implementing tougher rules for foreign law firms
International law firms could face tougher restrictions in Brazil as the Brazilian Federal Bar Association, Ordem dos Advogados do Brasil (OAB), considers drawing up new rules governing alliances between local and international law firms.
May 31, 2012 at 07:00 PM
3 minute read
Public hearing concludes alliances between local and global firms to be reviewed
International law firms could face tougher restrictions in Brazil as the Brazilian Federal Bar Association, Ordem dos Advogados do Brasil (OAB), considers drawing up new rules governing alliances between local and international law firms.
The issue, which was debated in an OAB public hearing last month (7 May), is contentious, as some local practices feel threatened by international firm moves to break into the sought-after market by providing international law advice.
The hearing, attended by groups including the Inter-American Bar Association, the International Union of Lawyers, as well as representatives from the Law Society of England and Wales and various international law firms, concluded that alliances between local and international firms need to be reviewed as they fall outside the remit of existing regulations.
It found existing regulations restricting practice in Brazil apply only to foreign firms and professional consultancies rather than alliances, paving the way for the OAB either to amend current regulations to incorporate alliances or come up with new regulations, with the latter the more likely option.
In the meantime, while attendees voted not to toughen the existing Provimento 91/2000 regulation governing foreign firms in Brazil, it is likely to be more stringently applied, as the local Bar continues to resist the market opening up.
Linklaters, DLA Piper and Kennedys are among the raft of international firms with associations in Brazil, while others to have recently announced plans to open their own foreign law offices, including Hogan Lovells and DAC Beachcroft.
DAC Beachcroft partner Hermes Marangos said: "In all cases, the opening of the market has been accompanied by stricter rules to ensure Brazilian businesses are protected. This recent decision creates uncertainty about how associations will be run and firms will want to be careful – you don't want to invest heavily only to find you can't share in the benefits of your investment."
Co-founder of UK business network LatAm Forum Yves Hayaux-du-Tilly observed: "It will be difficult for the OAB to draw up new rules governing alliances that are very pro-international investment. If no other industry in Brazil has this, why should law be any different?"
The Law Society is set to travel to Brazil later this year as part of a delegation by the Lord Mayor to promote business links between the UK and Brazil and will meet with the OAB as part of the visit to discuss the rules for foreign law firms. A spokesperson said: "We have actively followed the recent debate by the OAB, and it is encouraging to note that it will now consider new rules on alliances between foreign and Brazilian firms."
For more, see Eversheds sets sights on Brazil as UK firms continue to eye up BRIC benefits.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSkadden, White & Case Guide Citigroup Demerger in Mexico
Baker McKenzie, Galicia, Pérez-Llorca and Von Wobeser Promote Partners in Mexico
Mexican Lawyers On Speed-Dial as Trump Floats ‘Day One’ Tariffs
Trending Stories
- 1Who Are the Judges Assigned to Challenges to Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order?
- 2Litigators of the Week: A Directed Verdict Win for Cisco in a West Texas Patent Case
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4Womble Bond Becomes First Firm in UK to Roll Out AI Tool Firmwide
- 5Will a Market Dominated by Small- to Mid-Cap Deals Give Rise to a Dark Horse US Firm in China?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250