Brazilian Bar debates implementing tougher rules for foreign law firms
International law firms could face tougher restrictions in Brazil as the Brazilian Federal Bar Association, Ordem dos Advogados do Brasil (OAB), considers drawing up new rules governing alliances between local and international law firms.
May 31, 2012 at 07:00 PM
3 minute read
Public hearing concludes alliances between local and global firms to be reviewed
International law firms could face tougher restrictions in Brazil as the Brazilian Federal Bar Association, Ordem dos Advogados do Brasil (OAB), considers drawing up new rules governing alliances between local and international law firms.
The issue, which was debated in an OAB public hearing last month (7 May), is contentious, as some local practices feel threatened by international firm moves to break into the sought-after market by providing international law advice.
The hearing, attended by groups including the Inter-American Bar Association, the International Union of Lawyers, as well as representatives from the Law Society of England and Wales and various international law firms, concluded that alliances between local and international firms need to be reviewed as they fall outside the remit of existing regulations.
It found existing regulations restricting practice in Brazil apply only to foreign firms and professional consultancies rather than alliances, paving the way for the OAB either to amend current regulations to incorporate alliances or come up with new regulations, with the latter the more likely option.
In the meantime, while attendees voted not to toughen the existing Provimento 91/2000 regulation governing foreign firms in Brazil, it is likely to be more stringently applied, as the local Bar continues to resist the market opening up.
Linklaters, DLA Piper and Kennedys are among the raft of international firms with associations in Brazil, while others to have recently announced plans to open their own foreign law offices, including Hogan Lovells and DAC Beachcroft.
DAC Beachcroft partner Hermes Marangos said: "In all cases, the opening of the market has been accompanied by stricter rules to ensure Brazilian businesses are protected. This recent decision creates uncertainty about how associations will be run and firms will want to be careful – you don't want to invest heavily only to find you can't share in the benefits of your investment."
Co-founder of UK business network LatAm Forum Yves Hayaux-du-Tilly observed: "It will be difficult for the OAB to draw up new rules governing alliances that are very pro-international investment. If no other industry in Brazil has this, why should law be any different?"
The Law Society is set to travel to Brazil later this year as part of a delegation by the Lord Mayor to promote business links between the UK and Brazil and will meet with the OAB as part of the visit to discuss the rules for foreign law firms. A spokesperson said: "We have actively followed the recent debate by the OAB, and it is encouraging to note that it will now consider new rules on alliances between foreign and Brazilian firms."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump and Latin America: Lawyers Brace for Hard-Line Approach to Region
IFC Settles With Victims of Palm Oil Project in Honduras
Hunt for Lithium Puts Latin American Lawyers in the Crosshairs
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250