Outsourcing in focus as RBS prepares to cut back legal roster
Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) has kicked off a much-anticipated review of its legal panel, with tender documents sent out to law firms late last month. Firms have until 22 June to submit their pitches to RBS, with the online tender widely expected to result in the bank's list of preferred advisers being scaled back.
June 07, 2012 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
Bank pushes for LPO options from advisers in anticipated review
Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) has kicked off a much-anticipated review of its legal panel, with tender documents sent out to law firms late last month.
Firms have until 22 June to submit their pitches to RBS, with the online tender widely expected to result in the bank's list of preferred advisers being scaled back.
The review will cover all of RBS' panels, including its core transactional roster for clients, a transactional panel for the bank's own deals and a debt recovery line-up.
Successful firms are expected to be appointed in the autumn for a three-year term running from January 2013.
According to partners who have seen the tender document, the bank is putting an emphasis on legal process outsourcing (LPO), with law firms seeking positions on the panel required to demonstrate they have sufficient capabilities in place.
It is understood that the remaining terms are broadly similar to RBS' last review in 2009 in terms of chargeout rates and value-added services, in contrast to previous reviews which have seen the bank push advisers hard on fees.
Linklaters has traditionally been RBS' main corporate adviser, with other firms appointed to the roster in 2009 including Ashurst, Allen & Overy (A&O), Berwin Leighton Paisner, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Herbert Smith.
Between 60 and 80 law firms are thought to have been selected in total across RBS' various legal sub-panels during the last review but, although the latest tender document does not specify numbers, partners expect the new line-up to be significantly smaller.
One partner said: "I know from discussions with RBS that they do have an overall aim of reducing the panel. The review is of all of RBS' sub-panels, but the main focus is always the core transactional panel."
Legal Week has previously reported that firms frequently bill the bank at a discounted hourly rate of around £350, compared with £450-£500 for other major financial institutions.
However, the bank's weaker financial position (it received a £45bn Government bailout during the credit crunch) and reduced work flows have prompted advisers to speculate that it would struggle to secure further reductions in fees.
News of RBS' review comes as Lloyds Banking Group gears up to launch a review of its legal panel later this summer, with early discussions between Lloyds and advisers already taking place.
The roster was last overhauled in October 2010 when the bank drew up its first combined panel for legacy Lloyds TSB and HBOS. The line-up at that point included firms such as A&O, Linklaters, Clifford Chance, Hogan Lovells, SNR Denton, Norton Rose and Herbert Smith.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGCs Responsible for Gender Balanced Boardrooms Under New EU Rules
A Dark Future of Deepfakes and Disobedient AI: What GCs Foresee For 2050
3 minute readShein GC's Responses to Supply Chain Questions 'Bordered on Contempt', Say Lawmakers
Trending Stories
- 1Legal Tech's Predictions for Knowledge Management in 2025
- 2Fenwick Shutters Shanghai Office
- 3Litigators of the (Past) Week: Defending Against a $290M Claim and Scoring a $116M Win in Drug Patent Fight
- 4Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 5Am Law 50's Head Count 'Holding Pattern' Could Trickle Down
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250