Dundas votes in duo to succeed Shaw as new co-managing partners
Dundas & Wilson has elected Caryn Penley and Allan Wernham as its new new co-managing partners on a joint ticket. The appointments, which were confirmed by partners at a meeting in Scotland today (20 June), come alongside the election of intellectual property partner Laurence Ward as chairman.
June 20, 2012 at 12:11 PM
2 minute read
Dundas & Wilson has elected Caryn Penley and Allan Wernham as its new new co-managing partners on a joint ticket.
The appointments, which were confirmed by partners at a meeting in Scotland today (20 June), come alongside the election of intellectual property partner Laurence Ward as chairman.
Ward is taking over from David Hardie, who has overseen the election process and will step down after three years of a four-year term on 31 July.
Restructuring partner Penley (pictured) and real estate partner Wernham became interim joint managers in March after Donald Shaw stood down from the role.
The confirmation of their permanent appointments will see the duo serve a four-year term from 1 August, after seeing off competition from corporate partners Colin Massie and Michael Polson, who stood as individual candidates.
Wernham said: "Caryn and I are honoured to be chosen by our partners to lead our firm and we look forward to delivering on our shared vision. We have been elected on a growth agenda and we will work with all of our colleagues to focus on our clients and ensure that our firm is best placed to meet the challenges ahead."
Ward, who beat real estate partner Iain Lindsay to the chairman role, endorsed the joint managing partners, saying: "I look forward very much to working with them both. As chairman, my first priority will be to support them in implementing and driving forward our firm's strategy for growth."
The news comes after energy and infrastructure head Keith Armstrong resigned from the firm earlier this week (18 June) after irregularities were discovered in a pitch he worked on. An internal inquiry showed Armstrong came into possession of confidential information about the client, thereby prejudicing the tender.
- For more, see Dundas partner resigns after tender 'irregularities'
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPérez-Llorca, Deloitte Legal and White & Case behind €1B Green Deal in Spain
South Africa Regulator’s Staffing Problems Leave High-Stakes M&A Deals in Limbo
4 minute readGoodwin, Conyers, A&O Shearman Act on $800M China Biotech Sale
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250