Top Russian investment bank RenCap kicks off 'very competitive' adviser review
Russian investment bank Renaissance Capital has kicked off a review of its law firm roster after group head of compliance Mark Harris took up an expanded role as head of legal earlier this year.
June 21, 2012 at 07:03 PM
2 minute read
City advisers called to pitch as RenCap's incoming law chief starts new panel review
Russian investment bank Renaissance Capital has kicked off a review of its law firm roster after group head of compliance Mark Harris took up an expanded role as head of legal earlier this year.
The Moscow-headquartered bank sent out pitch documents to all of its current panel firms – which include Allen & Overy (A&O) and Herbert Smith – as well as a number of non-panel firms advising it on an ad hoc basis earlier this month.
Harris (pictured), who joined Renaissance Capital in 2010 from defunct bank Lehman Brothers, where he was managing director and head of compliance for Europe and the Middle East – is leading the review after taking up the group head of legal role earlier this year.
The biannual review is expected to conclude later this year. Former vice chairman Ashar Qureshi, who left the bank in February to join independent film company Luminaire Films as executive vice chairman, was previously responsible for the legal team and led the last review in 2010.
That review saw Qureshi, who joined Renaissance Capital in 2010 from the London office of Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, appoint around a dozen firms.
A&O won a first-time appointment alongside existing panellists Herbert Smith, Hogan Lovells, Cleary, White & Case, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom, and Latham & Watkins.
In addition, five more firms were added to provide advice in local jurisdictions such as sub-Saharan Africa or on specialist areas such as litigation.
Renaissance Capital drew up its first formal legal roster in 2009, when then general counsel Steven Wootton set about capping legal fees and building deeper relationships with a smaller number of firms.
Qureshi then decided to expand the line-up when he joined the following year to mirror the international growth of the emerging markets-focused bank.
Commenting on the latest review, one partner said: "We didn't make it onto the panel in 2010, and the bank is giving us another go. We have heard the process is likely to be very competitive – they are keen to improve contracting costs."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBroadcom Hires From Nuclear Giant to Appoint French Legal Head
GCs Say They are Getting 'Edged Out' of UK Boardrooms
'I Won’t Name the Firm, But...'—Barratt Redrow's Legal Head on External Counsel Red Flags
Trending Stories
- 1Pharma Company Faces Breach-of-Contract Claim Over $1.3 Million in Unpaid Invoices
- 2KPMG Law Seeks Alternative Business License, Shaking Up Legal Status Quo
- 3Pittsburgh's Reed Smith, K&L Gates Join Fight to Save Nippon Steel-U.S. Steel Merger
- 4Milbank, Wachtell, Ropes and Pittsburgh Duo Aim to Save Nippon Steel-U.S. Steel Merger
- 5A Top Connecticut Lawyer Has Resigned
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250