Ex-Dewey partners pursued by banks over professional practice loans
Former partners of bankrupt firm Dewey & LeBoeuf are being pursued by banks trying to reclaim money they lent through professional practice loans. Citi is among the lenders attempting to claw back loans made to both lateral hires and internal partner promotions at Dewey to fund their capital contributions to the firm, according to ex-partners.
June 25, 2012 at 04:57 AM
3 minute read
Former partners of bankrupt firm Dewey & LeBoeuf are being pursued by banks trying to reclaim money they lent through professional practice loans.
Citi is among the lenders attempting to claw back loans made to both lateral hires and internal partner promotions at Dewey to fund their capital contributions to the firm, according to ex-partners.
It is unclear exactly what period of lending the banks are pursuing; however, partners told Legal Week that some of those joining the partnership in 2010 and 2011 have been contacted in an attempt by the banks to reclaim the loans.
Capital contributions were calculated based on each partner's annual target compensation, with those joining required to pay in 36% of this annual target. The initial contribution was funded over a one-year period, according to Dewey's 2010 bond memorandum.
Dewey had arrangements with several banks to provide loans to individual partners joining the equity, with Barclays understood to have provided many loans in the early 2000s, and Coutts and Citi providing many of those issued from 2007.
According to former partners, those who took loans from Citi over the last two years are considering grouping together to instruct legal counsel in an attempt to reach an agreement with the bank.
Steven Otillar, an oil and gas partner who joined Dewey's Houston office in January 2011 from Baker & McKenzie and is now at Akin Gump, confirmed to former partners during a conference call last Monday (19 June) that Citibank was pursuing legal action against him for not repaying the loan.
One partner commented: "A small minority of partners have opted to pay back the banks out of personal savings, but the majority are unable to do so and are disputing the claim. It would be sensible for partners with similar interests to jointly instruct a law firm to negotiate with Citibank – watch this space."
News of the banks' attempts to reclaim funding comes after Dewey's bankruptcy team outlined details of a proposed plan that could see a settlement with former partners reached within the next six weeks, bringing in much-needed money to the estate.
On last week's conference call, the team proposed a settlement that would absolve former partners – with the exception of former chairman Steven Davis – of any future liability in relation to the firm, according to a person on the call.
A "critical mass of partners" will have to agree to the settlement in order for it to be approved, although the bankruptcy team did not specify what the number would be.
Partners on the conference call stated that the team had been given an end-of-July deadline from the banks to come up with proposals on claiming contributions from partners, at which point the bankruptcy could be converted to a Chapter 7.
Former executive partner Steve Horvath, who oversaw the conference call, confirmed to partners that their capital contributions would be taken into account when calculating what each partner owes the estate.
- For more on Dewey's collapse, see Our Lehman: how Dewey went from proud US giant to the largest-ever legal failure
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Heavyweights Wrestle in High-Stakes Sale of Venezuela’s Citgo
Cleary vs. White & Case: NYC Showdown Over $5 Billion Brazilian Bankruptcy
Singapore's Drew & Napier Secures $3.5B Award in Civil Suit
Trending Stories
- 1How We Won: Samsung Defeats Data Breach Class Action
- 2With Florida’s Lateral Hiring Remaining Steady in 2024, Here’s the Top Hires Throughout the State
- 3Capital Markets Partner Rejoins O’Melveny Ahead of Expected Uptick in Demand
- 4Pharma Company Faces Breach-of-Contract Claim Over $1.3 Million in Unpaid Invoices
- 5KPMG Law Seeks Alternative Business License, Shaking Up Legal Status Quo
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250